Search Articles

Search Results: MemorySafety

The Memory Safety Reckoning: Decades of Warnings Ignored as C/C++ Flaws Dominate Critical Vulnerabilities

Graydon Hoare's analysis reveals a stark truth: despite decades of warnings dating back to the 1970s, memory safety vulnerabilities in C and C++ continue to dominate critical security flaws, accounting for 60-70% of high-severity issues. Industry and government reports from Microsoft, Google, CISA, and NSA consistently highlight this preventable crisis, questioning why foundational unsafe languages remain entrenched in critical infrastructure. This isn't a new vulnerability—it's a systemic failure to adopt safer alternatives.

C++26 Declares War on Undefined Behavior with 'Erroneous Behaviour' for Safer Code

C++26 introduces 'erroneous behaviour' to replace undefined behavior for uninitialized variable reads, transforming potential crashes into diagnosable errors. This shift, spearheaded by proposal P2795R5, enforces well-defined but incorrect outcomes while enabling compilers to flag issues, bolstering safety without sacrificing the 'pay-for-what-you-use' ethos. A critical evolution for developers battling memory-related instability in high-performance systems.
Swift Evolution Advances with SE-0458: Introducing Strict Memory Safety by Default

Swift Evolution Advances with SE-0458: Introducing Strict Memory Safety by Default

Swift's Evolution proposal SE-0458 aims to enforce strict memory safety across entire modules by default, eliminating current language gaps that permit undefined behavior. This transformative change would prevent entire classes of memory-related bugs and position Swift as a leader in safe systems programming. The proposal lays groundwork for Swift 6's safety guarantees while maintaining source compatibility.