Search Results: OpenReview

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2026 has been forced to reset its entire peer review process after a critical security vulnerability in the OpenReview platform exposed thousands of submissions, leading to a wave of harassment, bribery attempts, and potential collusion that threatened the integrity of AI research evaluation.

Academic peer review has long relied on human judgment to validate scientific claims, but when those claims hinge on complex, poorly documented software, the process becomes a bottleneck. This article explores why code quality matters, the practical hurdles reviewers face, and emerging strategies to bridge the gap between research and reproducible software.