Operation Endgame: How Law Enforcement Just Crippled Three Major Malware-as-a-Service Networks
Share this article
 increase complexity and cost for attackers.
What This Means for Security Teams and Engineers
For practitioners, this disruption is an opportunity, not a victory lap.
1. The Credential Theft Problem Is Bigger Than You Think
The mention of millions of credentials and access to 100,000+ crypto wallets should recalibrate your threat model:
- Assume long-term persistence of stolen credentials in criminal markets.
- Treat password-only auth as effectively compromised.
- Tighten MFA coverage, especially for:
- cloud consoles and CI/CD platforms
- remote access (VPN, RDP, jump hosts)
- identity providers and SSO
At scale, credentials are still the cheapest, quietest path into your environment.
2. Incident Response: Turn This Takedown Into a Detection Sprint
Use the Operation Endgame window to:
- Cross-check exposure: Europol recommends:
- https://politie.nl/checkyourhack
- https://haveibeenpwned.com
- Hunt for historical compromise:
- Outbound C2 to infrastructure previously associated with Rhadamanthys, VenomRAT, Elysium.
- Unusual remote desktop, PowerShell, or process injection activity from endpoints now known to be infected.
- Invalidate at scale:
- Rotate credentials that may have been exposed.
- Reissue API tokens and long-lived service credentials.
Takedowns buy time; they do not reset your environment.
3. Builder vs. Buyer: Shifts in the Underground Supply Chain
Every time law enforcement successfully disrupts a MaaS platform, two things happen:
- Less capable actors are locked out, unable to self-build.
- More capable actors go further underground, investing in:
- hardened, multi-layer C2
- self-hosted panels on compromised infrastructure
- custom cryptors and loaders (as seen in prior Conti/LockBit collaborations)
For blue teams, expect:
- More bespoke variants and short-lived infrastructures, reducing IOC reuse but increasing behavioral detection value.
- Greater emphasis on initial access brokers leveraging infostealers; cutting their supply chain remains critical.
How Developers and Infrastructure Teams Can Respond Practically
If you build or operate systems, you are in the blast radius of infostealers and RATs, whether you see it or not. A few concrete measures that directly counter the tools hit in this operation:
Protect developer credentials like production secrets.
- Store tokens, SSH keys, and cloud creds in a managed secrets vault.
- Enforce hardware-backed keys (FIDO2, smartcards) for Git, CI, and cloud admin roles.
Instrument for anomalous control-plane activity.
- Alert on new API keys, new OAuth apps, or MFA resets from unusual IPs/ASNs.
- Monitor for access to CI/CD from endpoints previously tied to stealer infections.
Contain remote access tooling risk.
- Strictly inventory and approve any remote control tools.
- Log process command lines; VenomRAT-like activity is often behaviorally obvious when visibility exists.
Build stealer-aware secure coding and ops culture.
- Assume that any secret used on a compromised endpoint will be exfiltrated.
- Design for revocability and scope limitation of all tokens and keys.
None of this is glamorous, but it is precisely where Rhadamanthys-class operations monetize their access.
A Fragile Victory, and a Strategic Signal
Operation Endgame will not end infostealers, RATs, or botnets. Infrastructure can and will be rebuilt; code can be rebranded and resold. But this wave sends an unambiguous signal: running industrialized cybercrime at scale now carries real operational fragility.
For defenders, that fragility is leverage:
- Use this disruption window to find latent compromises.
- Pressure attackers’ economics by hardening identity, secrets, and remote access.
- Support and consume the growing ecosystem of public–private threat intelligence collaboration that made this action possible.
The story here isn’t that police “took down 1,025 servers.” It’s that infrastructure is now a contested domain—one where coordinated, data-driven, cross-border action can meaningfully degrade the service quality of cybercrime. The next move belongs to both sides; how quickly we operationalize this moment will determine who benefits more.