Article illustration 1

Image: A conceptual illustration of AI integration in business, symbolizing the strategic approach of successful adopters. (Credit: lerbank/iStock/Getty Images Plus via Getty Images)

We're in the midst of an AI paradox: Businesses are racing to adopt generative AI and automation, yet study after study reveals most are failing to capture real value. MIT research shows 95% of AI initiatives stall, while Atlassian reports 96% of organizations see no significant efficiency gains despite soaring usage. This raises a critical question—what separates the winners from the stagnant majority?

Cisco's third annual "AI Ready Index," released this week, provides answers. Surveying over 8,000 AI decision-makers across 26 countries, the study identifies a consistent cohort—roughly 14% of organizations—dubbed "Pacesetters." These aren't just early adopters; they're strategic architects building AI into their operational DNA.

The ROI Gap and the Rise of Pacesetters

The struggle for AI return on investment (ROI) stems from fragmented approaches. Many companies treat AI as a productivity gadget—deploying chatbots or coding assistants without addressing foundational risks like data security, legal exposure, or employee trust. As Cisco notes, this often backfires, creating more oversight work and minimal financial upside.

Pacesetters defy this pattern through systemic discipline. They view AI not as a standalone tool but as a core operating layer for their business—akin to an upgraded OS. This requires patient investment in infrastructure, governance, and culture rather than chasing quick wins.

"They adopt a system-level approach balancing strategy, infrastructure, data, governance, people and culture," Cisco's report states. "They plan ahead, invest early, and embed AI into the core of how they operate to deliver lasting value."

What Pacesetters Do Differently

Key differentiators emerged from Cisco's data:
- Strategic Roadmaps: 99% of Pacesetters have a clear AI adoption plan, versus just 58% of others. This includes phased integration goals and metrics aligned to business outcomes.
- Security First: 87% demonstrate high awareness of AI-specific threats (compared to 42% of peers), while 75% feel equipped to secure AI agents (vs. 32%). Trust isn't incidental—it's engineered.
- Focus on Fundamentals: Pacesetters prioritize unglamorous, high-impact automations like customer service or data processing over flashy experiments. Forrester and Andreessen Horowitz data corroborate this, showing backend AI tools often yield stronger ROI than consumer-facing applications.

This emphasis on trust is pivotal. A SAS/IDC study found distrust in AI outputs is a major ROI blocker—Pacesetters mitigate this through rigorous validation and transparency protocols.

Implications for Tech Leaders and Developers

For engineering teams, Pacesetters' success underscores that AI integration demands more than API calls. It requires:
1. Cross-functional collaboration between security, legal, and development teams to preempt risks.
2. Infrastructure readiness, including scalable data pipelines and MLOps frameworks.
3. Ethical guardrails to ensure tools enhance—not erode—user trust.

The lesson? Winning with AI isn't about models or algorithms alone—it's about treating technology as a holistic transformation. As one Pacesetter executive phrased it in the report: "AI isn't our newest app; it's becoming our workplace's nervous system." Those who architect accordingly will define the next era of enterprise tech.

Source: Adapted from Webb Wright's reporting for ZDNET. Original article: A minority of businesses have won big with AI. What are they doing right?