The ivory tower is under siege. Across universities, students deploy large language models like algorithmic mercenaries—automating essays, solving LeetCode puzzles, and outflanking plagiarism detectors with tools like Chungin "Roy" Lee's controversial 'interview coder' software. As James D. Walsh highlighted in his New York magazine exposé, educators face a crisis: some retire in despair, others deploy futile countermeasures, while students optimize for grades rather than knowledge. But what if the solution lies in borrowing tactics from an unexpected field: cybersecurity?

Article illustration 1

When Metrics Corrupt Learning

At the heart of this crisis lies Goodhart's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." For decades, higher education sold degrees as social mobility tickets, reducing learning to transactional GPA optimization. Students rationally respond by gaming the system—memorizing for exams, plagiarizing essays, and now leveraging LLMs as academic cheat codes. As one teaching assistant observed, premed students would battle over 0.25-point deductions while ignoring course concepts entirely. The emergence of ChatGPT didn't create this behavior; it merely weaponized it.

The Hacker Mindset: Offense and Defense

This is where education can learn from cybersecurity's eternal arms race:

  • Black Hat Students: Like malicious hackers exploiting vulnerabilities, they use LLMs to breach academic systems—generating essays, coding solutions, and evading detection. Their goal: minimum effort for maximum grades.
  • White Hat Educators: These academic defenders mimic ethical hackers, constantly stress-testing their systems. They ask: If an AI can solve this exam in seconds, does it actually measure learning? Their mission: redesign assessments where cheating becomes meaningless.

"We need White Hat Educators who help students see the beauty in their quest for knowledge," argues Kelvin Paschal. "The modern educator must adapt to the changing landscape of tools."

Building Academic Firewalls

Traditional exams and essays are crumbling firewalls. Effective countermeasures require two principles:

  1. Human-Centric Evaluation: Presentations force students to demonstrate understanding in real-time, fielding unpredictable questions. Projects demand unique synthesis—planning, iteration, and problem-solving that LLMs can't replicate wholesale.
  2. Outcome Over Output: Shift from grading polished deliverables to assessing process. Code reviews, design rationales, and iterative prototypes reveal comprehension better than final submissions.

These methods already exist but are often marginalized. Increasing their weight in grading creates "cheat-proof" assessments not because they're unhackable, but because cheating defeats their purpose.

The Urgent Pivot

The lesson isn't to ban AI but to redesign systems where using it transparently enhances learning. Just as white hat hackers assume breaches will happen, educators must assume students will use LLMs—then build assessments that demand critical thinking no AI can provide. The future belongs to institutions that treat education like secure systems: constantly audited, patched, and resilient by design.

Source: Educators as Hackers by Kelvin Paschal