Inside the Travel Charger Arms Race: Why This 70W Adapter Punches Above Its Weight
Share this article
![Main article image](
alt="Article illustration 1"
loading="lazy">
Source: ZDNET, "The one travel gadget I always pack, and how it's unlike any other charger I've tested" (Nov. 12, 2025) – Adrian Kingsley-Hughes
The GaN Era Has a Design Problem
Over the past few years, GaN chargers have become the default flex for hardware makers: higher power density, cooler thermals, smaller forms. We’ve seen 100W+ and 140W+ pocketable bricks that look incredible on spec sheets and in product photos.
But talk to anyone who actually travels hard—engineers bouncing between regions, SREs on call at data centers, security researchers doing field work—and a pattern emerges:
- Overpowered single-port bricks that don’t handle multi-device loads gracefully
- Universal adapters that wobble out of EU sockets or dangle under their own weight
- Cable chaos that adds bulk, tangles, and failure points
The Enercore CG11 isn’t a revolution in raw capability. It’s a rebuttal to those design failures.
What Baseus Got Technically Right
alt="Article illustration 2"
loading="lazy">
)
At first glance, the CG11 looks like any other chunky, all-in-one travel cube. Look closer and the engineering decisions start to read like a checklist written by someone who has lost one too many charges to bad hotel outlets.
1. A Sensible 70W, Not a Vanity 140W
On paper, 70W won’t win any YouTube thumbnail battles. In practice, it’s the sweet spot for:
- Ultrabooks and MacBook Air / lower-draw MacBook Pro users (slower than OEM bricks, but perfectly usable)
- Tablets, phones, earbuds, wearables, headlamps, and power banks
- Mixed-device charging scenarios where no single port needs to be a monster
The adapter’s total output is capped at 60W when all USB ports are used, but the system is designed for real-world loads: a laptop plus a phone and a watch, or a tablet plus radios and wearables. For most technical travelers, that’s exactly the operating profile.
Could Baseus have pushed 100W+ with GaN? Absolutely. But extra wattage would mean more heat, more stress on components, bigger thermal margins, and higher cost—without materially improving most travel workflows.
This is an example of engineering to need, not to marketing.
2. The Built-In USB-C Cable Is the Killer Feature
The CG11’s smartest idea is also easy to miss: a built-in, retractable, 27-inch flat braided USB-C cable capable of delivering the full 70W.
Why this matters to a technical audience:
- Fewer failure modes: One less external cable to forget, damage, or under-spec.
- Guaranteed capability: That integrated cable is rated properly, avoiding the all-too-common “mystery C-to-C” bottlenecking fast charge or PD negotiation.
- Reduced pack complexity: If you’ve ever done a pre-flight desk sweep at 3 a.m. looking for the “good” cable, you already understand the value.
Mechanically, the retractable system offers multiple length presets and smooth operation—critical, because poorly engineered retractors are notorious weak points. In extended testing (per ZDNET’s reporting), both the cable and reel held up, which is non-trivial engineering under repeated travel stress.
And there’s a quietly practical social benefit: nobody “borrows” a permanently attached cable.
3. Port Layout That Respects Real Loads
On the underside, the Enercore CG11 packs:
- 1 x USB-C (up to 60W)
- 1 x USB-A (up to 60W)
- 1 x USB-A (5W, ideal for low-power peripherals)
Combined with the integrated C cable, that’s four outputs sharing up to 60W.
For the average dev or engineer on the road, that maps cleanly to:
- Laptop or tablet on USB-C
- Smartphone on USB-A/USB-C
- Low-draw wearables (watch, tracker, headlamp) on the 5W port
It’s not a power strip for a multi-monitor workstation; it’s a power router for a mobile stack. And in that role, it’s correctly provisioned.
4. Solving the “Falling Out of the Wall” Problem
Most universal adapters position AC prongs centrally. That looks symmetrical, but in shallow or loose sockets—particularly in parts of Europe—these blocks sag, tilt, or straight-up eject.
Baseus moves the prongs toward the top edge. It’s a small geometric change with outsized impact:
- Shifts the center of gravity closer to the wall
- Reduces torque on the socket
- Keeps weight hanging below the connection point, not levering it out
If you’ve ever returned to a hotel room at midnight to find your laptop at 7% because your adapter drooped 3mm out of an EU socket, this detail alone is worth paying for.
5. "Cruise Approved" with Nuanced Safety Trade-offs
One standout detail: the Enercore CG11 omits built-in surge protection, a design choice made to comply with cruise ship electrical policies that often ban surge-protected devices due to fire risk concerns.
Instead, Baseus leans on:
- A fused 10A supply (with a spare fuse included)
- Overload, overvoltage, overheating, and short-circuit protection
- Fire-resistant polycarbonate housing
For most urban and business travel contexts—with relatively well-behaved grids—this is an acceptable trade, though developers heading into regions with unstable power may still want a dedicated, external surge protector in their kit.
This separation of concerns—adapter as a robust router, separate from surge handling—aligns with how infrastructure engineers design resilient systems: modularize responsibilities instead of stuffing everything into a single brittle box.
Why This Matters for the People Who Actually Ship Software
At first glance, this might look like a consumer travel tip. For technical professionals, it’s more interesting than that.
The Enercore CG11 is a tight physical analogy for several trends shaping how we design and operate modern systems:
- Opinionated, multi-tenant power: Just as cloud platforms have moved from raw-CPU fetishism to balanced, right-sized instances, this adapter favors a realistic power profile over big-number marketing.
- Integrated but inspectable: The built-in USB-C cable feels like a well-documented dependency: tightly integrated, capability-guaranteed, and less prone to accidental downgrade.
- Reliability-driven ergonomics: Details like prong placement mirror reliability engineering in distributed systems—small architectural choices that drastically reduce edge-case failures.
- Honest constraints: Dropping surge protection to satisfy a real-world deployment environment (cruise ships, tight clearances) reflects a mature understanding of constraints instead of pretending one device can safely do everything, everywhere.
Developers and tech leads know that devices don’t fail in the lab; they fail in transit, in badly wired hostels, at airport gates, or five minutes before a demo. Tools that minimize that risk—even if they’re “just chargers”—protect uptime in the only currency that really matters on the road: working hours.
A Quiet Win for Thoughtful Hardware
At around $36 (discounted from $50 at the time of ZDNET’s review), the Baseus Enercore CG11 lands in a sweet spot: not a disposable gadget, not an over-engineered status symbol.
It embodies something we don’t see enough of in travel tech: responsible restraint. Enough power, enough ports, genuine safety engineering, and two or three sharp, experience-driven design decisions that make a tangible difference when you’re far from a spare charger.
For developers and engineers who live between sockets, this adapter is more than a convenient cube—it’s a reminder that good engineering isn’t about maxing every metric. It’s about understanding the use case, honoring the constraints, and quietly eliminating the failure modes no one puts in the brochure.
And that’s exactly the kind of hardware thinking the rest of our industry could use more of.
Primary source: ZDNET – "The one travel gadget I always pack, and how it's unlike any other charger I've tested," by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes (Nov. 12, 2025). Pricing, specs, and claims are based on the source article and may change over time.