C# Without the Ceremony: Why .NET 10’s File-Based Apps Matter

For most of C#’s life, the trade-off was clear: you got a rich ecosystem, powerful tooling, and industrial-strength performance—in exchange for projects, solutions, csproj files, and a fair amount of ceremony.

With .NET 10’s file-based apps, that bargain changes.

Now you can run a single C# file as an application with one command, no explicit project scaffolding, and still access the full .NET ecosystem. It’s a small syntactic shift with big strategic implications: C# steps directly into territory long dominated by Python, Node.js, and bash for automation, CLIs, and one-off tools.

Source: appsoftware.com – .NET 10 File Based Apps Demonstration (C# Scripting)

Article illustration 1

From Experimental Scripting to First-Class Citizen

C# scripting isn’t new. Tools like dotnet-script proved that developers wanted a lightweight way to run C# without spinning up a full project. Many teams quietly adopted it for internal utilities, data migrations, and quick automation.

What changes with .NET 10 is not the idea, but the endorsement:

  • File-based apps are now part of the official toolchain.
  • No extra global tools or unofficial workflows required.
  • You get scripting ergonomics with platform support and long-term viability.

This matters for engineering leaders and platform teams. Relying on community tooling for core workflows introduces risk; baking scripting into .NET 10 lowers operational friction and legitimizes C# as a scripting-first option in production environments.

How It Works: A Script That Feels Like a Real App

The demo from the referenced GitHub repo (dotnet-10-file-based-apps-test) illustrates just how far you can go in a single file.

Key behaviors shown:

  1. Run a C# file directly:

    dotnet run example.cs
    
  2. Use a NuGet package inline via #:package syntax:

    #nullable enable
    #:package [email protected]
    using Microsoft.Data.Sqlite;
    
  3. Execute real application logic:

    • Create or open an SQLite database.
    • Ensure a RunHistory table exists.
    • Insert the current UTC execution timestamp.
    • Query and print all previous runs.
  4. Handle errors and exit codes cleanly:

   catch (Exception ex)
   {
       Console.ForegroundColor = ConsoleColor.Red;
       Console.WriteLine("
FATAL ERROR: Could not connect to or write to SQLite database.");
       Console.WriteLine($"Details: {ex.Message}");
       Console.ResetColor();
   }

   Console.WriteLine("Finished");
   return 0;

This isn’t a toy REPL snippet. It’s a compact, production-shaped script exercising:

  • async database I/O
  • external dependencies
  • structured logging
  • safe failure paths

In other words: the kind of behavior you’d typically wire up in a full .NET project—now available in a single, directly runnable file.

The Upgrade Path: From Script to System

One of the most thoughtful aspects of this design is the escape hatch.

As scripts grow in complexity, they inevitably hit a point where they deserve:

  • multi-file organization
  • shared libraries
  • tests
  • CI/CD integration

.NET 10 bakes in a migration path:

dotnet project convert example.cs

This is more than a convenience. It encodes a workflow philosophy:

  1. Start small with a file-based app.
  2. Prove value quickly.
  3. When it graduates from “useful script” to “critical tool,” promote it to a full project without rewriting from scratch.

For platform and tooling teams, this enables:

  • rapid prototyping using the same language and runtime as production systems
  • consolidation of automation stacks (fewer languages to secure, monitor, and support)
  • smoother lifecycle from experiment to long-lived internal tool

Strategic Implications: A New Slot in the Stack

Why does this matter in a world already rich with scripting options?

Because file-based apps attack long-standing friction points that kept C# out of everyday ops:

  • "I don’t want to spin up a project for a 30-line DB utility." Now you don’t have to.
  • "Our team is all-in on .NET in production but uses Python/Node for scripts." Now you can align language, tooling, and security across the stack.
  • "We need typed, performant automation but can’t justify ceremony-heavy setups." Now you get types, performance, and minimal setup in one shot.

For:

  • DevOps and SREs: write deployment helpers, health check tools, migration runners, and one-off incident scripts in the same ecosystem as your services.
  • Backend teams: create throwaway or semi-permanent utilities that talk to your real infra with proper types and SDKs.
  • Security-conscious orgs: reduce the sprawl of runtime environments and dependencies by leaning more heavily on a single, well-governed platform.

It also strengthens .NET’s competitive posture. Python and Node still dominate scripting, but once C# feels as immediate to run as python script.py, organizations already invested in .NET have fewer reasons to reach for something else.

Subtle Power, Big Payoff

The file-based app demo may look like a simple SQLite logger, but it signals a deeper shift in how .NET wants to be used: not just for heavyweight microservices and enterprise backends, but for the glue work, the utilities, the everyday tasks that quietly run everything.

Developers rarely switch ecosystems for a flashy feature. They switch—or stay—because the path from idea to running code gets smoother.

With .NET 10’s file-based apps, C# just erased one of its last big sources of friction. Now the interesting question isn’t whether C# can compete with scripting languages.

It’s how quickly teams will realize they no longer need to choose.