Article illustration 1

You've likely consumed more AI-generated content today than you realize. According to a comprehensive analysis by SEO firm Graphite, over half of all newly published web articles are now synthetic creations, with AI briefly overtaking human authors between November 2024 and March 2025. In January 2025 alone, AI-generated pieces peaked at 55% of published content—a staggering surge from just 39% a year after ChatGPT's 2022 debut.

"We hypothesize this plateau exists because practitioners found AI-generated articles don't perform well in search," Graphite researchers noted, highlighting a critical flaw in the AI content boom.

The data reveals an ironic twist: The very algorithms powering search engines appear to be rejecting their synthetic cousins. Despite AI content's ubiquity, Graphite found it rarely surfaces in Google or ChatGPT results. This aligns with earlier studies showing AI content often lacks the depth, nuance, and originality that search algorithms prioritize.

Meanwhile, user skepticism remains high. A Pew Research study found only 2% of Americans regularly get news from AI, while 75% actively avoid it. Those who do consume machine-generated news report significant distrust in its accuracy—a concerning signal for publishers banking on automation.

Why the Plateau Matters

  • Quality Quicksand: The initial flood of low-effort AI content created a race to the bottom, but search engines' apparent demotion of synthetic material suggests quantity won't trump quality.
  • Detection Arms Race: As AI writing improves, distinguishing human from machine becomes harder, forcing detectors to evolve rapidly—though Graphite notes detection tech is keeping pace.
  • Trust Deficit: Pew's findings underscore a fundamental challenge: Even when AI content technically ranks, users may dismiss it. As ZDNET's analysis notes, this highlights "AI's viability as an information tool" remains questionable.
Article illustration 2

Image: Ekaterina Goncharova/Moment/Getty Images

The standoff presents a dilemma for developers and content teams. While tools like GPT-5 promise efficiency, Graphite's data suggests blind automation risks invisibility. The most viable path forward may be hybrid workflows—using AI for research and drafting while retaining human editors for nuance, fact-checking, and strategic SEO refinement.

As algorithms and audiences grow increasingly discerning, the web's great AI experiment is entering a new phase: one where synthetic content must either evolve to meet higher standards or remain trapped in the digital backwaters. The plateau isn't an endpoint, but a warning—without substance, even perfectly grammatical AI prose becomes background noise in an overcrowded internet.