Article illustration 1

The 2024 elections marked AI's contentious debut in political campaigning—a trial by fire where deepfakes, synthetic voices, and algorithmically generated content entered the political arena with minimal guardrails. Now, the National Democratic Training Committee (NDTC) is attempting to codify responsible AI usage with the first official playbook for Democratic campaigns ahead of the midterms. The guidelines arrive amid warnings that Democrats risk falling behind Republicans who aggressively adopted the technology last cycle.

The AI Campaign Arsenal

NDTC's three-part training program, developed with progressive tech incubator Higher Ground Labs, positions AI as a "competitive necessity" rather than a luxury—especially for under-resourced campaigns. "It's something that we need our learners to understand and feel comfortable implementing so they can have that competitive edge," emphasizes Donald Riddle, NDTC's senior instructional designer. The curriculum trains campaign teams to leverage AI for:

  • Drafting social media posts, fundraising emails, and phone banking scripts
  • Researching districts and opponents
  • Editing video content (using tools like Descript and Opus Clip to trim awkward pauses)
  • Developing internal training materials

Crucially, all outputs require human review before publication. The playbook explicitly forbids replacing human creatives with AI art generators to "maintain creative integrity" and support working artists.

The Red Lines: Deepfakes and Deception

In its most significant ethical stand, the playbook draws bright lines against:

"Deepfaking opponents, impersonating real people, or creating images and videos that could 'deceive voters by misrepresenting events, individuals, or reality. This undermines democratic discourse and voter trust."

The guidelines also mandate transparency disclosures when AI generates "deeply personal" content, synthetic voices, or contributes significantly to policy development. UC Berkeley's Hany Farid, a leading AI ethics researcher, underscores why this matters: "Transparency isn't just about disclosing what's not real—it's so that we trust what is real."

The GOP's AI Head Start

The urgency behind NDTC's initiative stems from Republican campaigns' aggressive AI adoption during 2024. Examples cited in the training include:

  • Pro-DeSantis groups using AI-generated planes and fake Trump audio in ads
  • Trump sharing deepfaked images of Taylor Swift endorsing him
  • $1.2 million spent by Republicans on Campaign Nucleus—an AI platform founded by ex-Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale—to automate ad targeting

Democrats, meanwhile, largely confined AI to routine tasks like drafting fundraising emails. "We need campaigns to really invest and integrate AI at every level," admits Kate Gage of Higher Ground Institute. The concern? That reluctance could cede technological ground in 2026.

The Transparency Dilemma

Farid warns that asymmetric ethics between parties could destabilize digital discourse: "The parties don't operate with the same rules... that's going to complicate this whole equation." As synthetic media tools grow more sophisticated and accessible, NDTC's framework represents Democrats' first structured attempt to harness AI's efficiency without eroding public trust—a high-wire act with democracy's credibility in the balance.

_Source: WIRED_