After six years of regulatory battles, Nvidia has sold its remaining Arm shares for $140 million, ending its $40 billion acquisition attempt but maintaining crucial licensing partnerships for its AI hardware.
Nvidia has officially closed the book on its long-running attempt to acquire Arm Holdings, selling off its final 1.1 million shares worth approximately $140 million. This marks the end of a saga that began in September 2020 when Nvidia announced plans to purchase the British semiconductor design firm for $40 billion, only to face years of regulatory scrutiny and ultimately abandon the deal in 2022.
The Rise and Fall of a $40 Billion Deal
The acquisition attempt came at a pivotal moment in tech history. As the world grappled with the COVID-19 pandemic, Nvidia was positioning itself for what would become the AI revolution. The proposed deal would have been one of the largest semiconductor acquisitions ever, second only to Dell's $64 billion purchase of EMC in 2016.
However, the deal faced immediate opposition from major tech players. Companies like Qualcomm, Samsung, and Apple—all significant Arm licensees—raised red flags with regulators about potential anti-competitive practices. Their concerns were valid: Arm's chip designs power everything from smartphones to data center servers, and an Nvidia-owned Arm could theoretically give the GPU giant unfair advantages over its competitors.
Regulators in both the UK and EU launched investigations in early 2021, examining whether the merger would harm consumers through higher prices and reduced innovation. Despite Nvidia's assurances that it would maintain Arm's licensing model and continue working with existing partners, the deal began to unravel in early 2022.
The final blow came when regulators forced Nvidia to pay a $1.25 billion exit fee, and SoftBank ultimately took Arm public in 2023 with a valuation of just under $55 billion. Today, Arm's market cap has grown to $133 billion, making it one of the most valuable semiconductor companies in the world.
Why the Deal Mattered (and Why It Doesn't Anymore)
At the time, the Arm acquisition would have given Nvidia unprecedented control over the CPU market. Arm's designs are found in billions of devices worldwide, from Apple's M-series chips to Qualcomm's Snapdragon processors. Owning Arm would have allowed Nvidia to potentially integrate its GPU technology more deeply with Arm's CPU designs, creating powerful new computing platforms.
However, the tech landscape has shifted dramatically since 2020. The AI boom has created entirely new categories of computing demand, and Nvidia has found alternative paths to dominance. Rather than owning Arm, Nvidia has built an ecosystem around its GPUs that has proven even more valuable.
Nvidia's New Strategy: Partnerships Over Ownership
Despite losing the Arm deal, Nvidia has maintained and even strengthened its relationship with the company. The two firms continue to collaborate on Arm-based CPUs for Nvidia's AI hardware platforms, including the upcoming Vera Rubin system. This partnership allows Nvidia to leverage Arm's energy-efficient CPU designs while maintaining its independence.
More importantly, Nvidia has pivoted to a strategy of strategic investments and partnerships across the tech industry. The company now holds stakes in Intel, CoreWeave, Nokia, and Synopsys. Its most recent high-profile deal was a $20 billion non-exclusive licensing agreement with AI inferencing hardware firm Groq, which includes acquiring key staff members to advance Nvidia's AI hardware efforts.
This approach has proven remarkably successful. Nvidia's market cap has grown from around $150 billion when it attempted to buy Arm to over $4.5 trillion today—a staggering 3,000% increase. The company is now the most valuable in the world, and it's throwing around tens of billions of dollars in deals like pocket change.
The AI Hardware Landscape Today
The failure of the Arm deal hasn't slowed Nvidia's momentum in the slightest. In fact, it may have accelerated the company's growth by forcing it to innovate and partner rather than simply acquire.
Nvidia's GPU dominance has become even more pronounced in the AI era. The company's data center revenue has exploded as companies rush to build AI infrastructure. Recent deals include providing millions more GPUs and Spectrum-X Ethernet switches to Meta, further cementing its position as the backbone of the AI revolution.
Meanwhile, Arm has thrived as an independent public company. Its market cap of $133 billion represents a significant premium over the $40 billion Nvidia was willing to pay, suggesting that independence has been beneficial for both companies.
What This Means for the Future of Computing
The Nvidia-Arm saga offers important lessons about the tech industry's evolution. First, it demonstrates that regulatory scrutiny of tech mergers has teeth—even when dealing with companies as powerful as Nvidia. Second, it shows that sometimes the best path forward isn't acquisition but partnership and ecosystem building.
For the broader tech industry, the failure of this deal has likely been beneficial. Competition in the CPU market remains healthy, with Arm continuing to license its designs to multiple competitors. This ensures that no single company can dominate both the CPU and GPU markets, which is crucial for innovation and consumer choice.
Looking ahead, Nvidia's strategy of deep partnerships rather than outright ownership seems to be working exceptionally well. The company has positioned itself at the center of the AI revolution without needing to own the entire stack. Its GPUs remain the gold standard for AI training and inference, and its investments across the tech ecosystem ensure it benefits from the broader industry's growth.
As for Arm, its independence has allowed it to continue serving all its customers equally, from Apple to Qualcomm to Nvidia itself. This neutrality is perhaps its greatest asset, and it's a role that would have been compromised had the Nvidia acquisition gone through.
The $40 billion deal that never was may have seemed like a setback at the time, but in retrospect, it appears to have been the right outcome for both companies—and for the tech industry as a whole. Sometimes, the best deals are the ones that don't happen.
Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion