![Main article image](


alt="Article illustration 1"
loading="lazy">

) AI agents are finally growing up. What started as straightforward, stateless calls to a single large language model has turned into something more complex—and more fragile. Modern AI systems chain multiple models, tools, vector stores, APIs, memory layers, and routing logic. They operate autonomously, make decisions, spend your budget, and talk to your customers. And yet many teams still monitor them with screenshots, ad-hoc logs, and vibes. VictoriaMetrics’ latest blueprint—"AI Agents Observability with OpenTelemetry and the VictoriaMetrics Stack"—lands at exactly this inflection point. It doesn’t just pitch tooling; it articulates what proper observability for AI agents should look like and offers a concrete, open, standards-based path to get there. _Source: VictoriaMetrics — "AI Agents Observability with OpenTelemetry and the VictoriaMetrics Stack"_

From prompts to production systems

Today’s AI agents are:

  • Multi-hop: A single user request may trigger a cascade of LLM calls, tool invocations, function calls, and external integrations.
  • Stateful: They maintain context, memory, and sometimes profiles or workspace state across conversations.
  • Expensive: Tokens, embeddings, vector queries, and API calls map directly to real money.
  • Risky: Hallucinations, partial failures, and silent tool errors can cause bad outputs with high business impact.

For engineering leaders, this creates a familiar but sharper problem: if you can't see it, you can't control it.

Traditional app monitoring (request latency, CPU, HTTP codes) is blind to:

  • Which prompts perform poorly and why.
  • Where tool calls fail inside a multi-step plan.
  • How cost, latency, and quality vary by model, provider, or prompt version.
  • How often LLM outputs are off-policy or misaligned with business rules.

The VictoriaMetrics stack, wired up with OpenTelemetry, pushes AI agents into the same first-class observability framework as any critical distributed system—only with AI-native semantics.

OpenTelemetry as the lingua franca for AI agents

The core architectural decision is the use of OpenTelemetry (OTel) as the standard for instrumentation.

Instead of inventing yet another proprietary logging or tracing format for AI interactions, this blueprint:

  • Uses OTel traces to represent full agent workflows: from initial request to the final response, including every LLM call, API call, and tool invocation.
  • Attaches span attributes for AI-specific context: model name, provider, temperature, token counts, latency, cost, routing decisions, tool names, and error reasons.
  • Emits metrics for operational health: request volume, error rates, tail latency, model usage, and per-model/per-tool SLOs.
  • Captures logs and structured events for debugging and policy analysis.

That decision matters.

By leaning on an open standard, teams get:

  • Interoperability across languages, frameworks, and vendors.
  • Extensibility as AI agents evolve (new tools, models, chains, or orchestrators).
  • Compatibility with existing observability workflows, Grafana dashboards, and alerting systems.

This isn’t “AI-only” monitoring bolted on the side. It’s AI observability embedded in the same ecosystem that already runs your infra and apps.

Inside the VictoriaMetrics-based observability stack

The reference architecture is intentionally pragmatic: everything is containerized and wired together to be reproducible in real environments.

Key components:

  1. VictoriaMetrics

    • A high-performance time-series database storing metrics (and, via the broader stack, traces and logs).
    • Optimized for large cardinality and high-ingest scenarios—a natural fit for high-volume AI traces across many models, tenants, and tools.

  2. OpenTelemetry Collector

    • Central pipeline for metrics, traces, and logs emitted by AI agents or orchestration frameworks.
    • Normalizes and exports data into VictoriaMetrics-compatible backends.

  3. Grafana

    • Unified observability front-end.
    • Dashboards visualize latency, error rates, token usage, costs, per-model performance, tool reliability, and more.
    • Supports drill-down from high-level SLOs into individual traces for root-cause analysis.

  4. AI Agent / Orchestrator Integration

    • The blueprint assumes instrumentation at the level of:
      • Each agent decision and step.
      • Each LLM call (prompt, completion metadata, tokens, model).
      • Each tool call (inputs, outputs, errors).
    • This is where the design pushes teams to move beyond opaque black-box LLM calls and capture semantically meaningful spans.

Deployed together (e.g., via Docker), this becomes a self-contained but production-ready environment where:

  • Every user query is a trace.
  • Every model/tool invocation is a span.
  • Every cost, latency, and error is a queryable signal, not tribal knowledge.

What developers actually gain

For practitioners building or running AI agents, this architecture unlocks capabilities that many teams are currently approximating with brittle hacks.

  1. End-to-end traceability of AI behaviors

    • See the full call graph: how a request fans out across LLMs, tools, retries, and branches.
    • Identify where responses degrade: slow tool, flaky provider, misrouted step, or a specific model version.
    • Trace individual incidents (e.g., a bad answer or hallucination) back to their exact decision path.

  2. Cost and performance governance

    • Attribute cost per tenant, feature, model, or route.
    • Correlate performance and cost: where are you overpaying for negligible quality gain?
    • Create concrete SLOs like: “95% of responses from the planning agent complete in < 2s with < $0.02 per request.”

  3. Safe iteration on prompts and policies

    • Track the impact of prompt changes or routing strategies across live traffic.
    • Compare models: success rates, completion quality proxies, latency distributions.
    • Use observability data to drive evaluations, guardrail strategies, or A/B tests.

  4. Operational reliability for multi-agent systems

    • Detect partial failures that don’t surface as HTTP 500s: tool timeouts swallowed by the agent, fallback cascades, or misaligned retries.
    • Alert on emergent pathologies (e.g., a new model version doubling hallucination-related fallbacks or token usage).

In other words, this isn’t just about pretty dashboards; it’s about turning AI systems into measurable software systems with:

  • Accountability: you can prove what happened.
  • Predictability: you can see regressions early.
  • Controllability: you can tune behavior with feedback grounded in data.

Why this approach matters for the AI ecosystem

Several strategic choices in VictoriaMetrics’ blueprint deserve attention from architects and platform teams.

  1. Open, not proprietary

    • By centering on OpenTelemetry, the stack avoids locking teams into a single agent framework, LLM vendor, or closed observability SaaS.
    • It’s aligned with how modern infra, microservices, and Kubernetes workloads are already instrumented.

  2. Designed for AI-scale cardinality

    • AI workloads explode metric and trace cardinality: per-model, per-tenant, per-tool, per-route, per-prompt version.
    • VictoriaMetrics is built to tolerate this kind of scale efficiently, which is not a given for all backends.

  3. Compatible with the messy reality of AI systems

    • Most organizations are hybrid: multiple LLM providers, internal models, custom tools, varying SDKs.
    • OpenTelemetry’s flexible semantic conventions and extensible attributes model enable gradual adoption instead of a full rewrite.

  4. Foundation for higher-level quality and safety layers

    • Once traces include prompts, responses (or fingerprints), tools, and metadata, they can feed:
      • Offline and online evaluations.
      • Safety and policy checks.
      • Automated regression detection for model updates.
    • The observability substrate becomes the data backbone for responsible AI operations, not just infra health.

This is the quiet but critical shift: observability moves from “dashboarding what broke” to “governing how the AI behaves.”

Where serious teams go from here

If you’re running or planning real AI agents in production, treating them like opaque LLM wrappers is no longer defensible.

The VictoriaMetrics + OpenTelemetry pattern offers a clear next step:

  • Instrument your agents with OTel spans that reflect real semantic steps (plan, route, call_tool, call_llm, validate, respond).
  • Emit metrics for latency, cost, and failures keyed by model, tool, tenant, and experiment.
  • Store and visualize them using an open, scalable stack where AI signals live alongside your existing service telemetry.

Not every organization will adopt the exact VictoriaMetrics implementation. That’s fine. The more important takeaway is architectural: AI agents deserve first-class observability with open standards, cost-aware analytics, and full-fidelity traces of machine decision-making.

The teams that implement this now will be the ones who can safely scale from “cool demo” to “business-critical autonomy” without flying blind.