Article illustration 1

For 18 months, I immersed myself in AI coding assistants—Copilot, Claude, Gemini—determined to master the future of software development. What emerged wasn't just workflow insights, but a fundamental contradiction: while vendors tout massive efficiency gains, the reality for seasoned developers is often slower velocity and hidden costs.

The Great Efficiency Illusion

Tech giants broadcast staggering adoption metrics:

"Over 25% of Google's code is now AI-written" – Sundar Pichai
"20 million developers use GitHub Copilot" – Microsoft

Yet independent studies (like this ACM analysis) consistently show experienced developers actually slow down when using AI tools. Why the disconnect? Metrics focus narrowly on code acceptance rates, not the downstream costs:
- Debugging AI-generated errors
- Refactoring poor abstractions
- Patching security gaps

"AI lures you down rabbit holes of bad abstractions that take hours to fix," the author notes. "For anything beyond trivial tasks, it becomes a hindrance."

Where AI Shines (and Where It Doesn't)

The Wins:

  1. Eliminating "Bullshit Code": Automating boilerplate (5% of daily work) like migration files or API parameter handling
  2. Rapid Prototyping: Generating Figma-to-React boilerplate or PoCs that transform sales meetings
  3. Research Assistant: Solving obscure errors (e.g., fixing pgx connection pool issues in Go)

The Reality Checks:

  • CLI > IDE: Command-line tools force deliberate thinking; autocomplete encourages passive acceptance
  • Frontend ≠ Complexity: AI generates UI skeletons but can't solve real challenges: accessibility, device fragmentation, network resilience
  • The 10% Trap: AI handles the first 90% of a task quickly—but the final 10% (edge cases, scalability, security) consumes 90% of the effort

The Vibe Coding Epidemic

Prompt-driven development ("vibe coding") creates systemic risks:

// AI-generated N+1 query hazard  
for _, book := range books {  
    author := db.Query("SELECT * FROM authors WHERE id = ?", book.AuthorID)  
    //...  
}

This approach—fetching authors individually for 10,000 books—would cripple databases. Yet AI defaults to such anti-patterns, prioritizing completion over performance.

The Hidden Tax: AI-Generated Tech Debt

AI is the ultimate tech debt accelerator:
- Complexity Bias: Suggests JSON blobs in relational databases "for flexibility"
- Security Blind Spots: Misses SQL injections, auth flaws
- Reusability Failure: Duplicates logic instead of abstracting

"After letting AI handle bulk endpoint logic," the author recounts, "I spent hours fixing channel deadlocks in Go and insecure error handling. Writing it myself was faster."

The Unlikely Winners

While developers grapple with these tradeoffs, non-coders reap disproportionate benefits:
- Product owners validate ideas with AI-built PoCs
- Sales teams demo customized prototypes in meetings
- Managers automate status reports instead of syncs

Beyond the Hype Cycle

The future isn't AI replacing developers—it's augmenting human collaboration. As the tools mature, focus should shift:
1. Prioritize CLI-style interaction for deliberate coding
2. Reserve AI for prototyping/research, not production logic
3. Invest in AI literacy to spot anti-patterns

"The real promise," concludes the author, "isn't faster coding—it's reclaiming time. Time for deep work. Time with family. That's the efficiency that matters."

Source: Priver.dev