Two years after Navalny's death in a Siberian penal colony, the UK and European allies have accused Russia of using a rare dart frog toxin called epibatidine to kill the opposition leader, citing evidence that only the Russian state had the means and opportunity to deploy this lethal substance.
The UK and European allies have accused Russia of killing opposition leader Alexei Navalny using a rare toxin derived from dart frogs, marking a significant escalation in allegations surrounding his death two years ago in a Siberian penal colony.
Speaking from the Munich Security Conference, UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper announced that analysis of material samples found on Navalny's body revealed the presence of epibatidine, a toxin that can be found naturally in dart frogs in South America. Cooper stated unequivocally that "only the Russian government had the means, motive and opportunity to deploy this lethal toxin against Alexei Navalny during his imprisonment in Russia."
A joint statement issued by the UK, Sweden, France, Germany, and the Netherlands reinforced this position, declaring: "Only the Russian state had the means, motive and opportunity to deploy this lethal toxin to target Navalny during his imprisonment in a Russian penal colony in Siberia, and we hold it responsible for his death."
The allies emphasized that there is "no innocent explanation" for the toxin's presence in Navalny's body. Dart frogs in captivity do not produce this toxin, and it is not found naturally in Russia, making its appearance in Navalny's system highly suspicious.

Navalny's widow, Yulia Navalnaya, who has consistently claimed her husband was poisoned by Russia, welcomed the announcement. "I was certain from the first day that my husband had been poisoned, but now there is proof," she said. "I am grateful to the European states for the meticulous work they carried out over two years and for uncovering the truth."
Navalnaya had previously announced in September that analysis of smuggled biological samples carried out by laboratories in two countries showed her husband had been "murdered," though she did not provide details at that time.
The UK Foreign Office has informed the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons of Russia's alleged breach of the Chemical Weapons Convention. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot paid tribute to Navalny, describing him as someone "killed for his fight in favour of a free and democratic Russia."
Navalny, an anti-corruption campaigner and Russia's most prominent opposition leader, died suddenly in jail on February 16, 2024, at the age of 47. He had previously survived a poisoning attempt in 2020 with Novichok nerve agent, which forced him to seek treatment in Germany. Upon his return to Russia, he was immediately arrested at the airport and subsequently sentenced to prison on what many considered trumped-up charges.
At the time of his death, Navalny had been in jail for three years and had recently been transferred to an Arctic Circle penal colony. According to Russian accounts, the 47-year-old took a short walk at his Siberian penal colony, said he felt unwell, then collapsed and never regained consciousness.
The Kremlin has not commented on the latest allegations. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who studiously avoided naming Navalny while he was alive, briefly referred to him a month after his death by stating that a person passing was "always a sad event."
This new evidence adds to the mounting international pressure on Russia regarding Navalny's death and raises serious questions about the methods employed by the Russian state against political opponents. The use of such a rare and specific toxin suggests a level of sophistication and intent that goes beyond standard prison conditions, pointing to a deliberate assassination rather than natural causes or negligence.
The international community's unified stance on this matter represents a significant diplomatic challenge for Russia, as it faces accusations not just of political repression but of using chemical weapons against its own citizens. The implications of these findings could have far-reaching consequences for Russia's standing in international relations and its compliance with chemical weapons treaties.

Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion