Azure Fleet Manager offers powerful controls for orchestrating AKS upgrades across multiple clusters, but finding the right balance between speed and safety requires careful planning around update stages, groups, and capacity constraints.
Upgrading Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters at scale presents a significant operational challenge for platform teams managing multiple environments. Azure Fleet Manager provides sophisticated orchestration capabilities to streamline this process, but with great power comes the need for thoughtful design decisions that balance upgrade velocity against operational safety.
The Foundation: Understanding Fleet Manager's Upgrade Architecture
At the core of AKS Fleet Manager's upgrade capabilities are three interconnected concepts that form the backbone of any upgrade strategy:
Update Runs represent the complete upgrade operation across your fleet. Each run defines both the update goal (such as targeting Kubernetes version 1.28.3) and the sequence for applying updates across member clusters. By default, clusters update sequentially, but Fleet Manager allows for sophisticated orchestration through stages and groups.
Update Stages divide the upgrade run into sequential phases. This enables platform teams to implement progressive rollout patterns—for instance, updating test environment clusters in the first stage, then production clusters in subsequent stages. Each stage can include configurable wait times between applications, providing crucial validation windows.
Update Groups operate within stages to select specific clusters for simultaneous updates. Groups within a stage update in parallel, while clusters within a group update sequentially. This hierarchical structure provides granular control over upgrade patterns while maintaining operational boundaries.
The Speed Equation: Two Levers for Faster Upgrades
The primary challenge in fleet-wide upgrades is minimizing total duration without compromising safety. Fleet Manager offers two distinct approaches to accelerate the process:
Reducing Update Stages
By consolidating clusters from multiple environments into fewer stages, teams can significantly reduce the overall upgrade timeline. For example, combining dev, test, and production clusters into a single stage eliminates the sequential wait times between environments.
However, this approach carries substantial risks. The validation window between environments shrinks dramatically, potentially allowing regressions to propagate from lower to higher environments before issues are detected. Microsoft's own best practices explicitly recommend maintaining separate stages with small initial groups to contain potential blast radius.
A critical consideration here is AKS's current limitation: rollback after upgrade is not supported. If a regression occurs, remediation requires provisioning entirely new clusters running the previous version—a time-consuming and resource-intensive process that can extend downtime significantly.
Increasing Update Groups
A safer acceleration strategy involves maintaining the staged approach while increasing parallelism within later stages. Starting from the second stage, teams can add more update groups to upgrade multiple clusters simultaneously.
This approach preserves the controlled validation phase in early stages while leveraging parallelism where risk is lower. However, parallel upgrades introduce their own challenges, particularly around infrastructure capacity.
The Capacity Challenge: When Parallelism Meets Infrastructure Limits
Running multiple AKS upgrades concurrently can trigger capacity failures, especially in scenarios involving:
- Availability Zone constraints: When node pools depend on VM SKUs with limited availability in specific zones
- Max Surge configurations: Higher surge values create more nodes simultaneously, amplifying capacity demands
- Regional resource quotas: Concurrent provisioning can hit subscription-level limits
These capacity constraints can cause individual cluster upgrades to fail, and here lies another critical limitation: at the time of writing, if any single AKS cluster upgrade fails during a Fleet Manager run, the entire upgrade operation halts. This all-or-nothing behavior can be particularly disruptive for large fleets where a single capacity issue in one region affects the entire upgrade timeline.
An open feature request (https://github.com/Azure/AKS/issues/5338) seeks to address this by introducing configurable safe-failure thresholds, allowing upgrades to continue even when some clusters encounter issues.
Designing Your Upgrade Strategy: Finding the Sweet Spot
The most effective AKS upgrade strategies recognize that speed and safety exist on a spectrum rather than as binary choices. The optimal approach typically involves:
Conservative initial stages: Start with small, focused groups in early stages to validate upgrades in lower-risk environments. This might mean beginning with a single test cluster or a small representative sample.
Graduated parallelism: Increase the number of update groups progressively through later stages, leveraging the validation insights gained from earlier phases to inform the pace of production upgrades.
Capacity-aware planning: Map your upgrade schedule against known capacity constraints, potentially staggering upgrades across different regions or availability zones to avoid simultaneous resource contention.
Observability integration: Ensure comprehensive monitoring and alerting during upgrades to detect regressions quickly, particularly in early stages where issues can be contained.
Rollback preparedness: While AKS doesn't support rollback, having clear procedures for rapid cluster reprovisioning with previous versions minimizes downtime when issues arise.
The Human Element: Collaboration and Environmental Awareness
Technical considerations aside, successful fleet upgrades require strong collaboration between platform, application, and operations teams. Understanding the specific characteristics of your applications, their upgrade tolerance, and the operational patterns of your environments is crucial for designing effective upgrade strategies.
Environmental awareness extends beyond just application behavior. Teams must understand regional capacity patterns, maintenance schedules, and business cycles to schedule upgrades during optimal windows. This contextual knowledge often proves more valuable than purely technical optimizations.
Looking Forward: The Evolution of Fleet Upgrades
As AKS and Fleet Manager continue to evolve, several developments could reshape upgrade strategies:
- Enhanced failure handling: Configurable thresholds for safe failures would make parallel upgrades more resilient
- Rollback capabilities: Native rollback support would dramatically reduce the risk of production issues
- Intelligent scheduling: AI-driven optimization could balance speed, safety, and capacity constraints automatically
- Enhanced observability: Deeper integration with application monitoring could provide earlier detection of upgrade-related issues
Conclusion: Strategic Thinking Over Technical Tweaking
The power of Azure Fleet Manager lies not just in its technical capabilities but in how it enables platform teams to think strategically about fleet management. The most successful upgrade strategies emerge from understanding the interplay between technical constraints, operational risks, and business requirements.
By approaching AKS upgrades as a strategic exercise rather than a purely technical task, teams can leverage Fleet Manager's capabilities to achieve both the speed demanded by modern development cycles and the safety required for production operations. The key is recognizing that the right balance isn't a fixed point but a dynamic equilibrium that shifts based on your specific context, constraints, and risk tolerance.
For teams beginning their journey with AKS Fleet Manager, start conservatively, learn from each upgrade cycle, and gradually refine your approach based on real-world experience. The investment in thoughtful strategy design pays dividends in reduced downtime, faster innovation cycles, and more resilient Kubernetes operations.
For additional resources on AKS Fleet Manager and upgrade orchestration, refer to the official Microsoft documentation:
Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion