Article illustration 1

In a swift policy reversal, Denmark has abandoned legislative provisions that would have banned virtual private networks (VPNs) used to access geo-restricted streaming content or circumvent website blocks. The controversial clause formed part of a broader anti-piracy bill but drew immediate condemnation from digital rights organizations and citizens who argued it threatened fundamental internet freedoms.

The backlash intensified when critics highlighted how the vaguely worded proposal could criminalize ordinary citizens using VPNs for legitimate security purposes. Jesper Lund of the IT Political Association described the measure as having a "totalitarian feel" that surpassed restrictions seen in authoritarian regimes. Facing mounting pressure, Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt announced the removal of the VPN section on Monday, stating: "I do not support making VPNs illegal, and I have never proposed to do so. The text was not formulated precisely enough."

Article illustration 2
  • Privacy vs. Piracy Enforcement: The proposal exposed tensions between aggressive copyright protection tactics and essential privacy tools used by businesses and individuals worldwide.
  • Technical Implications: Security experts warned that banning VPNs' circumvention capabilities would undermine critical encryption practices and data protection measures.
  • Broader Context: Denmark continues advocating for the EU's controversial "Chat Control" bill, making this VPN reversal a notable exception demonstrating public influence on tech policy.

The decision preserves Denmark's alignment with global norms where VPNs remain legal tools for security professionals and privacy-conscious users. As Engel-Schmidt concluded: "I am removing the section about VPNs so there is no longer any doubt that I in no way wish to ban VPNs." This episode underscores how public advocacy can recalibrate legislative approaches to technology regulation.

Source: TechRadar