Lenovo Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Data Collection Allegations
#Privacy

Lenovo Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Data Collection Allegations

Chips Reporter
3 min read

Lenovo denies allegations that its automated advertising infrastructure transmits American consumer data to China, violating U.S. regulations designed to prevent foreign adversaries from accessing behavioral data.

Lenovo is facing a class action lawsuit alleging that the company's automated advertising infrastructure transmits American consumer behavioral data to China, potentially violating U.S. Department of Justice regulations designed to prevent foreign adversaries from accessing sensitive data.

a person walking past a Lenovo signboard

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S., claims that Lenovo's data collection practices expose millions of American consumers' behavioral information to "foreign adversaries" through its advertising infrastructure and associated databases. According to the complaint, these actions directly violate the DOJ Rule, which was implemented to prevent adversarial countries from acquiring large quantities of behavioral data that could be used to surveil, analyze, or exploit American citizens' behavior.

Lenovo's Chinese Connections

The allegations are particularly significant given Lenovo's corporate structure. While Lenovo operates as a U.S. entity, its parent company, Lenovo Group Limited, is incorporated in Hong Kong with headquarters in Beijing, China. The company's largest shareholder is Legend Holdings Corporation, a Beijing-based investment firm established by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, a state institution of the People's Republic of China.

This corporate structure places Lenovo squarely within the "covered persons" provision of the DOJ regulation, which includes:

  • Individuals who reside in "countries of concern" or are controlled by entities in those countries
  • Entities organized or chartered under the laws of, or with principal place of business in, a country of concern
  • Entities owned 50% or more by such entities

The lawsuit asserts that Lenovo Group is subject to Chinese regulations including the National Intelligence Law, Cybersecurity Law, and Data Security Law. These laws compel individuals and institutions to cooperate with Chinese authorities when asked for data, raising concerns about potential government access to American consumer information.

When contacted for comment, Lenovo provided a strong denial of the allegations:

"Any suggestion that Lenovo improperly shares customer data is false. We take data privacy and security seriously and comply with all applicable data protection laws and regulations globally, including stringent U.S. requirements. Our data practices are transparent, lawful, and designed to protect our customers."

Industry Context

Lenovo is far from the only technology company gathering consumer behavioral data through automated advertising infrastructure. However, the lawsuit highlights unique concerns about companies with ties to countries designated as "countries of concern" by U.S. authorities.

The case raises broader questions about data privacy, cross-border data flows, and the challenges of regulating multinational technology companies operating in an increasingly complex geopolitical environment. As data privacy regulations continue to evolve globally, companies with international operations face growing scrutiny over their data collection and sharing practices.

Implications for Consumers

For American consumers, the lawsuit underscores the importance of understanding how their data is collected, stored, and potentially shared by technology companies. While Lenovo maintains that its practices are lawful and transparent, the case highlights the ongoing tension between data-driven business models and privacy concerns in an interconnected world.

The outcome of this class action lawsuit could have significant implications for how technology companies with international ties handle consumer data, particularly those with connections to countries subject to U.S. regulatory scrutiny.

Comments

Loading comments...