The relentless climb of global temperatures—2024 marked the warmest decade on record, with 15 countries hitting unprecedented highs—has intensified the search for solutions beyond emissions cuts. Despite modest reductions in the US and Europe, overall CO₂ emissions rose 0.8% last year, underscoring the inadequacy of current efforts. Permanent carbon removal, while promising, extracts mere tens of thousands of tons annually, a drop in the ocean compared to the 5–10 billion tons needed to cap warming at 1.5°C. Enter stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI): a controversial yet scientifically grounded approach to deliberately cool the planet by mimicking volcanoes.

Article illustration 1

The Volcano in the Machine: Pinatubo’s Legacy

On June 15, 1991, Mount Pinatubo ejected 17 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere. There, it oxidized into sulfuric acid aerosols—particles one-hundredth the width of a human hair—that scattered sunlight like microscopic mirrors. Over 18 months, these particles cooled Earth by 0.5°C. Satellite data and climate models validated the effect, revealing a critical insight: targeted aerosol release could temporarily offset greenhouse warming. Similar cooling followed El Chichón’s 1982 eruption and the 1815 Mount Tambora blast, which triggered the infamous 'Year Without a Summer.'

Article illustration 4

Caspar David Friedrich’s paintings from the early 1800s, created amid volcanic climate anomalies, evoke the eerie skies of a dimmed world.

This phenomenon hinges on Earth’s energy balance. Incoming solar radiation (averaging 340W/m²) warms the planet, while greenhouse gases trap outgoing heat. Sulfur aerosols disrupt this by reflecting sunlight—a cooling mechanism humans have unintentionally exploited through industrial pollution. For decades, tropospheric sulfate emissions (e.g., from coal plants and ships) masked ~0.4°C of warming. But when maritime regulations slashed sulfur in ship fuel in 2020, unmasked warming spiked, contributing to 20% of 2023’s record heat.

The Stratospheric Advantage: Precision Over Pollution

Unlike short-lived tropospheric sulfates (washed out by rain in days), stratospheric aerosols persist for 12–18 months due to stable, rain-free conditions. Here, the Brewer-Dobson circulation slowly disperses them poleward. Pinatubo’s 17 million tons reduced solar energy by ~2.5W/m². Models suggest just 10 million tons of strategically injected sulfur dioxide could offset 1°C of warming—far more efficient than ground-level emissions. With Earth already 1.2°C warmer and another 1.5°C projected, deploying 20 million tons annually to the stratosphere could neutralize all post-industrial warming.

Why Not Now? The Risks and Unknowns

Despite compelling evidence, SAI isn’t a plug-and-play solution. Key uncertainties remain:
- Uneven Cooling: Aerosols spread asymmetrically, with stronger equatorial effects. Polar regions might see less benefit, complicating efforts to target high-impact zones like melting ice caps.
- Collateral Damage: Pinatubo reduced solar panel output by 30% in 1992 and depressed global crop yields. Blocking sunlight directly undermines photosynthesis and renewable energy—critical in a world where solar provides 7% of electricity.
- Ozone Vulnerability: Sulfates catalyze ozone-depleting reactions. After Pinatubo, polar ozone levels dipped for two years.
- Termination Shock: Halting injections abruptly could trigger rapid warming rebound, as seen when COVID-19 lockdowns reduced pollution.

A Clinical Trial for the Climate

Inspired by drug safety protocols, researchers propose a phased framework to de-risk SAI:

  1. Phase 1: Micro-Tests (10 tons)
    Release minuscule amounts of sulfur dioxide above the tropopause. Monitor aerosol formation and dispersion using NASA’s Aura satellite, ground-based lidars, and high-altitude balloons. Unlike novel particles (e.g., calcite), sulfur’s chemistry is well-understood, minimizing 'unknown unknowns.'

  2. Phase 2: Regional Impact (100 tons)
    Scale up to study dispersal patterns and local climate effects. Instruments like the ISS-mounted Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment-III would track impacts on rainfall and temperature. For context, Indonesia’s 2024 Ruang eruption emitted 250,000 tons with no global effect.

  3. Phase 3: Sustained Cooling (1M tons/year)
    Trial continuous injection to cool Earth by 0.1°C over five years. This demands real-time monitoring via next-gen satellites and solar-powered stratospheric drones. Success hinges on predicting regional trade-offs—e.g., protecting equatorial crops without harming temperate solar farms.

Engineering the Sky: Logistics and Politics

Full deployment would require 300 specialized aircraft (akin to FedEx’s fleet) flying year-round to inject 20M tons of sulfur dioxide at 22km altitudes. Retrofitted Boeing 777s could handle polar regions, where the tropopause is lower. Estimated cost: $70B/year—less than wildfire damages in California alone.

Legally, no treaty bans small-scale tests, but political legitimacy is fragile. Initiatives like the Degrees Initiative and Africa Climate Intervention Research Hub are fostering global collaboration. As one researcher noted: 'If we can alleviate suffering in the hottest regions, we must explore this—as a complement to emissions cuts, not a substitute.'

The path forward is neither simple nor guaranteed. But with climate models sharpening and monitoring tech advancing, SAI represents a high-stakes engineering gamble. As emissions lag, it might buy time for carbon removal to mature—a temporary shield forged from volcanic wisdom.

Source: Works in Progress