The Hemingway Effect: Why Stopping Mid-Task Boosts Developer Productivity
Share this article
For developers wrestling with a stubborn bug or architects outlining a complex system, the advice of novelist Ernest Hemingway might seem counterintuitive: stop working precisely when you know what comes next. This tactic, dubbed the "Hemingway Effect," isn't procrastination—it's a cognitive hack backed by psychology that can significantly boost productivity in technical work.
Hemingway famously advised his protégé, Arnold Samuelson, to always leave work "when you’re still going good and you come to an interesting place and you know what’s going to happen next." This approach, recorded in With Hemingway: A Year in Key West and Cuba, ensures momentum carries into the next session. Modern psychology reveals why it works:
- The Zeigarnik Effect: Psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik discovered that our brains cling to incomplete tasks, generating psychological tension that keeps them active in our memory. Unfinished code or unresolved problems create a subtle cognitive itch demanding resolution.
- The Ovsiankina Effect: Maria Ovsiankina, Zeigarnik's colleague, found this tension manifests as a powerful urge to return to and complete interrupted tasks. Crucially, this drive is stronger for tasks we've started than those not yet begun. Starting a task, even briefly, activates this completion compulsion.
Why This Matters for Tech Professionals:
- Reduces Friction on Return: Stopping mid-flow with the next step clear eliminates the dreaded "where was I?" paralysis. Developers can immediately dive back into coding or debugging, bypassing costly context-switching delays.
- Sustains Intrinsic Motivation: Ending at a high point (e.g., after solving a sub-problem or defining a clear interface) builds positive anticipation. The brain's desire to resolve the cognitive tension (Zeigarnik) and complete the task (Ovsiankina) fuels motivation for the next session.
- Combats Burnout & Protects Focus: Hemingway warned against pumping "yourself dry." Stopping before exhaustion preserves mental energy. Research confirms that progress on unfinished tasks, even small amounts, reduces weekend anxiety and frees mental resources (Weiglet & Syrek, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health).
Applying the Hemingway Effect to Technical Work:
- Break Tasks Strategically: Don't just stop when the clock runs out. Aim to pause development at natural junctures: after defining a function's signature but before implementation, after identifying the root cause of a bug but before fixing it, or after drafting an API spec but before coding the endpoints.
- Document the Next Step: Hemingway knew what came next. Leave a clear
// TODO:comment, a concise commit message outlining the immediate next action, or a bullet point in your task tracker. Eliminate ambiguity. - Embrace Micro-Progress: Facing a massive refactor? Spend 30 minutes outlining the first module and defining its interface. The Ovsiankina Effect ensures this initial investment increases your commitment to seeing it through.
- Structure Interruptions: Protect your flow state. Use the effect proactively before scheduled meetings or necessary breaks to make re-engagement seamless.
While unstructured interruptions harm productivity, the Hemingway Effect leverages structured pauses. It transforms the brain's natural tendency to fixate on the unfinished into a powerful engine for momentum. For developers navigating complex, cognitively demanding work, stopping strategically isn't quitting—it's setting the stage for more effective, sustainable progress. As Hemingway understood, intelligently managing cognitive capital is key to long-term output and avoiding burnout in the relentless cycle of creation and problem-solving.
Source: Adapted from "Tap into the 'Hemingway effect' to finish what you start" by Kevin Dickinson (Big Think, July 7, 2025).