Amazon and Perplexity Clash Over AI Shopping Agents

Matthias Balk/picture alliance via Getty Images

In a landmark confrontation that pits e-commerce giants against AI disruptors, Amazon has issued a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity, demanding the AI startup halt its Comet browser from making purchases on Amazon's platform. The move escalates tensions over agentic AI—systems that autonomously act on users' behalf—and could redefine how consumers shop online.

The Legal Ultimatum

Amazon's letter accuses Perplexity of violating its conditions of use by failing to identify Comet as an AI agent during transactions. The retail giant claims Comet's actions "degrade the Amazon shopping experience" by bypassing critical user engagement points, potentially leading to suboptimal pricing, delivery choices, and privacy risks. Amazon warned of legal action if Perplexity didn’t comply by Monday, stating:

"Perplexity's ongoing illegal intrusion into the Amazon Store has already caused considerable harm, including disrupting Amazon's customer relationships."

Perplexity's Counterstrike

Perplexity responded with a fiery blog post titled "Bullying is not innovation," positioning itself as a champion of user empowerment against corporate gatekeeping. The startup argued that agentic AI represents a fundamental shift from algorithm-driven advertising models toward user-controlled experiences:

"For decades, machine learning has been weaponized by corporations to serve ads and manipulate choices. LLMs put power back in people's hands. Amazon's actions threaten all internet users."

The startup contends Comet streamlines shopping by eliminating spammy ads and predatory offers—directly challenging Amazon’s ad-revenue ecosystem.

The Agentic AI Revolution

At stake is the future of autonomous shopping agents. Unlike conventional tools, agentic AI like Comet can execute multi-step tasks—comparing prices, selecting products, and completing purchases—with minimal human input. This threatens Amazon's carefully curated shopping funnel, where recommendations, cross-sells, and delivery options drive engagement and revenue.

Amazon’s own AI assistant, Rufus, launched earlier this year, signals its ambitions in this space. CEO Andy Jassy recently told investors Amazon expects "to partner with third-party agents," suggesting a controlled ecosystem where Amazon dictates terms.

Broader Implications

The conflict exposes a tectonic shift in digital commerce:
1. Revenue Models: Agentic AI could disrupt the $500B digital ad industry by minimizing exposure to promotional content.
2. User Agency: Perplexity claims AI agents return control to users; Amazon argues they remove critical decision-making context.
3. Technical Transparency: Amazon insists agents must identify themselves—a precedent that could extend to all AI intermediaries.

As Shopify reports an 11x surge in AI-powered purchases, the industry watches whether Amazon's stance will become standard or crumble under innovation pressure. This legal skirmish may determine whether tomorrow’s shoppers delegate tasks to AI agents or remain within walled gardens designed for engagement over efficiency.

Ultimately, this battle transcends two companies—it’s a referendum on whether AI amplifies human agency or becomes another tool for platform control. With both sides digging in, developers and businesses should prepare for ripple effects across API access, agent regulations, and e-commerce architecture.

Source: ZDNet