Google's Common Expression Language: Aligning with Rust's Safety and Performance Principles

Google's recent open-sourcing of CEL-expr-python, an officially maintained Python implementation of the Common Expression Language (CEL), introduces technology that deeply resonates with Rust's core philosophy of safety and performance. While not a Rust-specific project, CEL's design principles offer valuable insights and potential integration points for Rust developers building secure systems.

The Common Expression Language embodies principles that align closely with Rust's focus on safety. CEL is non-Turing complete, side-effect free, and guaranteed to terminate—characteristics that mirror Rust's ownership model and its elimination of entire classes of runtime errors. For Rust developers building systems requiring policy evaluation, such as Kubernetes operators, service meshes, or configuration management tools, CEL provides a battle-tested solution that eliminates risks like infinite loops or unauthorized side effects.

One of the most compelling aspects of CEL is its "compile-once, evaluate-many" approach. This pattern resonates with Rust's emphasis on performance and zero-cost abstractions. By compiling expressions once and reusing them across multiple evaluations, developers can achieve the high throughput required in performance-sensitive applications while maintaining type safety—a pattern familiar to Rust developers who optimize hot code paths.

The fact that Google wrapped their official C++ implementation for the Python version suggests an approach that Rust developers would appreciate—leveraging a battle-tested core while providing language-specific extensions. This pattern mirrors how many Rust crates interface with C libraries through safe abstractions, demonstrating a commitment to safety even when working with lower-level components.

For Rust developers particularly concerned with security, CEL's non-Turing complete design eliminates the risk of infinite loops or resource exhaustion attacks that could occur with more expressive languages. This property makes CEL an excellent choice for evaluating policies or configurations that might come from untrusted sources, such as user-provided rules or external configuration files—scenarios where Rust's focus on safety shines.

The performance characteristics of CEL are also noteworthy. Google reports evaluation times ranging from nanoseconds to microseconds, making it suitable for high-throughput systems where policy evaluation might occur millions of times per second. This performance aligns with Rust's goal of providing predictable, high-performance execution without garbage collection pauses, making it an attractive option for performance-critical Rust applications.

Rust developers can leverage CEL in several practical ways. They can use CEL as an interchange format between Rust and Python components, ensuring consistent policy evaluation across different services. They can leverage CEL's type safety for configuration shared across different services, reducing the risk of configuration errors. They can take advantage of CEL's fast evaluation times in Rust applications requiring high-throughput policy evaluation. And they can use CEL's safety guarantees to evaluate policies from untrusted sources without risking infinite loops or resource exhaustion.

The CEL-expr-python project is available on GitHub, and Google provides a comprehensive tutorial via codelab. While these resources are Python-focused, the principles and patterns they demonstrate are directly applicable to Rust developers looking to implement safe, efficient policy evaluation in their systems.

This release underscores the growing importance of domain-specific languages for security-critical applications and highlights how technologies like CEL complement Rust's focus on building safe, performant systems. As the Rust ecosystem continues to mature, tools like CEL that prioritize safety and performance will become increasingly valuable components in the Rust developer's toolkit.

About the Author