Article illustration 1

In recent private lectures, tech billionaire Peter Thiel articulated a worldview merging Christian eschatology with geopolitics, positioning global conflicts through the lens of a metaphysical battle between the "Antichrist" and the "restrainer." While Thiel's rhetoric has drawn public scrutiny, the more pressing concern for the technology industry lies in the practical application of his business ventures—particularly through Palantir Technologies, the data analytics firm he co-founded. As Thiel's influence extends into artificial intelligence and military technology, the ethical and technical implications for developers and the sector are profound.

The Architect of Apocalyptic Capitalism

Peter Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal and an early Facebook investor, has long been associated with libertarian and right-wing political movements. His company Palantir, established in 2003, has grown into a dominant player in big data and AI, securing lucrative contracts with government agencies worldwide. Palantir's platforms—Foundry and Gotham—are designed to integrate and analyze vast datasets from disparate sources, serving applications from supply chain logistics to counterterrorism.

However, a significant portion of Palantir's business comes from defense and intelligence sectors, where its technology is deployed for military targeting, surveillance, and predictive policing. This dual-use nature of the technology places it at the heart of escalating debates about AI's role in modern warfare.

AI on the Battlefield: The Technical Landscape

Palantir's work in the military domain has raised critical questions about the role of AI in warfare. The company's software processes intelligence data, identifies targets, and optimizes military operations. For instance, the British Ministry of Defence recently announced a £1.5 billion strategic partnership with Palantir to "develop AI-powered capabilities already tested in Ukraine to speed up decision making, military planning and targeting."

From a technical standpoint, these systems employ advanced machine learning algorithms to sift through satellite imagery, communications intercepts, and other data streams to generate actionable intelligence. The challenge lies in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of these systems, as errors can have lethal consequences. Moreover, the use of AI in warfare blurs the lines between combatants and non-combatants, raising legal and ethical red flags that developers must confront.

The Ethical Crossroads for Technologists

The involvement of tech companies in military and surveillance applications has sparked a global debate within the developer community. Engineers are grappling with the moral implications of building tools that can be used for state violence and oppression. The case of Palantir is particularly contentious due to its reported use by the Israeli military in the Gaza conflict and by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for surveillance and deportation operations.

Palantir's platforms have been linked to "transformed lethality" in conflict zones. The company's Lavender and Gospel systems, for example, have been used to generate targets for aerial bombardment. Meanwhile, its ImmigrationOS platform assists in identifying individuals for arrest and deportation—a process criticized for enabling racial profiling and human rights abuses. This has led to calls for greater ethical guidelines within the tech industry, with some developers refusing to work on projects they deem harmful and others advocating for transparency in AI deployment.

The Business of War and Surveillance

From a business perspective, Thiel's strategic focus on AI and the military-tech nexus is a calculated move. As traditional tech markets face sluggish growth, Palantir has positioned itself at the intersection of two high-growth sectors: artificial intelligence and defense. The company's contracts with governments in the U.S., UK, and other nations have made it a key player in the burgeoning "digital-military-industrial complex."

Palantir's ability to secure such contracts is bolstered by Thiel's political connections and his advocacy for a vision of American exceptionalism that aligns with military dominance. This fusion of ideology and commerce has allowed the company to thrive, even as it faces criticism over its ethical practices. For developers, this creates a tension between innovation and complicity in systems that extend state power through technological means.

The Unseen Consequences: Code as a Weapon

As Thiel's apocalyptic geopolitics takes shape in code and contracts, the technology industry faces a reckoning. The systems being developed—whether for battlefield targeting or surveillance—represent a new frontier in state violence, where algorithms make life-or-death decisions with minimal human oversight. The implications extend beyond immediate harm to the erosion of democratic norms and the normalization of extrajudicial killings and mass surveillance.

For developers, the question is no longer just about what can be built, but what should be built. The rise of AI-powered military tech demands a reevaluation of professional responsibility, requiring engineers to consider the downstream consequences of their work in contexts far removed from their development environments. In an era of escalating geopolitical tensions, the choices made in code today may determine the battlefield of tomorrow.

Source: Jacobin, 2025