RondoDox Botnet Exploits Critical HPE OneView Vulnerability in Global Campaign
#Vulnerabilities

RondoDox Botnet Exploits Critical HPE OneView Vulnerability in Global Campaign

Privacy Reporter
3 min read

A critical vulnerability in HPE's OneView data center management platform is being exploited at scale by the RondoDox botnet, with over 40,000 automated attack attempts observed in under four hours, primarily targeting government agencies, financial institutions, and industrial organizations.

RondoDox Botnet Exploits Critical HPE OneView Vulnerability in Global Campaign

Featured image

A critical vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise's OneView data center management platform has become the focal point of a large-scale exploitation campaign by the RondoDox botnet, posing severe risks to organizational infrastructure and user data privacy. Cybersecurity firm Check Point Research has documented over 40,000 automated attack attempts exploiting the flaw within a single morning, with government entities representing the primary target.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-37164, carries a maximum-severity CVSS score of 10.0 due to its potential for unauthenticated remote code execution. First disclosed by HPE in mid-December 2025, the flaw exists in OneView's centralized management interface, which controls servers, storage, and networking hardware across enterprise data centers. This privileged position makes it an ideal target for threat actors seeking widespread network control.

Exploitation Mechanics and Botnet Attribution

Check Point's analysis confirms the RondoDox botnet is weaponizing this vulnerability using its signature "exploit-shotgun" methodology. This Linux-based botnet systematically scans for internet-exposed systems running vulnerable OneView instances, deploying payloads that transform compromised devices into nodes for distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, cryptocurrency mining, and secondary malware distribution.

Evidence links the campaign to RondoDox through distinctive command patterns and a unique user agent string observed in attack traffic. Activity spiked dramatically on January 7, coinciding with the vulnerability's addition to the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. During a concentrated four-hour window that day, attackers launched over 40,000 exploitation attempts from a single Dutch IP address already flagged in threat intelligence databases.

Sector-Specific Targeting and Regulatory Implications

The attacks show clear targeting patterns, with government organizations bearing the brunt (38% of incidents), followed by financial services (22%) and industrial manufacturing (17%). Geographically, the United States experienced the highest volume of attacks, with Australia, France, Germany, and Austria also significantly affected.

This campaign carries substantial compliance implications under data protection regulations including:

  • GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation): Unauthorized access to systems managing citizen data could trigger Article 33 breach notification requirements and fines up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue.
  • CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act): Compromised systems processing Californian residents' information may violate data security obligations, exposing companies to statutory damages of $100-$750 per consumer per incident.

Failure to patch creates liability exposure regardless of whether a breach occurs, as regulators increasingly view unmitigated critical vulnerabilities as negligence under these frameworks.

User Impact and Organizational Risk

Successful exploitation grants attackers administrative control over entire data center operations, creating multiple risk vectors:

  1. Data Sovereignty Violations: Attackers could exfiltrate sensitive government records or financial data, compromising citizen privacy and national security interests.
  2. Service Disruption: Botnet enrollment enables DDoS attacks that could cripple essential public services or financial transaction systems.
  3. Downstream Compromise: Infected systems often deliver secondary payloads like ransomware or credential stealers, expanding the attack surface.
  4. Resource Hijacking: Cryptomining operations degrade system performance while increasing organizations' energy costs and carbon footprint.

Despite HPE's patch availability since December, Check Point's findings indicate widespread unpatched systems remain vulnerable. HPE confirmed to media outlets that while no customer breaches have been formally reported, patching is "critical."

Mitigation Requirements

Organizations using HPE OneView must implement these protective measures immediately:

  1. Apply HPE's security patch (version 10.210 or later) without delay
  2. Segment network zones to isolate management interfaces from general corporate networks
  3. Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual process execution patterns
  4. Conduct audits of internet-exposed management systems
  5. Establish vulnerability response playbooks meeting CISA's 21-day remediation deadline for KEV-listed flaws

This incident underscores the critical importance of rapid patching cycles for privileged management systems. As botnets increasingly automate exploitation of high-severity vulnerabilities, organizations protecting sensitive data must prioritize infrastructure hardening to prevent cascading security and compliance failures.

Comments

Loading comments...