In an era dominated by apps like Obsidian and Neovim, developer and writer fd93 embarked on a counterintuitive experiment: replacing digital note-taking with spiral-bound Muji notebooks for 'fleeting thoughts'—those grocery lists, reading insights, and half-formed ideas often lost in app sprawl. The results? Sharmer cognition, unexpected depth in reflections on texts like The Miracle of Mindfulness, and a revelation: paper enforced a discipline that software couldn't replicate. This isn't just nostalgia—it's neuroscience. Writing by hand slows thought velocity, demanding curation and structure that combat the mind's chaos. As fd93 notes:

'The process of writing forces you to curate... especially true with a physical notebook, since very few people can write on paper as quickly as they can think.'

This analog approach anchors a three-stage knowledge pipeline: fleeting notes → organized insights in tools like Obsidian → published 'artifacts' like code or articles. Digital tools excel at stages two and three, with features like tags and hyperlinks enabling systems such as Zettelkasten. But skipping the first stage—by forcing premature structure—proved disastrous. When fd93 centralized notes digitally, the outcome was stark: no personal notes at all. The pressure to 'sully' a pristine app or fancy notebook stifled spontaneity—a pitfall avoided with disposable paper.

For tech professionals, the implications are profound. While tools like the author's daily-notes.nvim plugin bridge gaps, they can't replace the cognitive benefits of analog friction. Physical notebooks create a 'distraction-free zone,' fostering mindfulness that aligns with strategic thinking—echoing Sun Tzu's wisdom quoted in the notes: 'If you know the enemy and yourself, you need not fear the result of 100 battles.' In a world of notification overload, sometimes the most advanced tool is a humble notebook—proving that innovation isn't always digital.

Source: fd93.me