When a user recently asked which animal appears on the flag of a country where Britain established its first small colony in 1805—the same year Sweden declared war on France—Google's AI stumbled. ChatGPT, however, delivered the correct answer in seconds: the Sisserou parrot of Dominica.


alt="Article illustration 1"
loading="lazy">

This isn't just a win for artificial intelligence; it's an indictment of our collective failure to build organized systems for knowledge. As a recent piece by Rakhim [argues](https://rakhim.exotext.com/ai-is-impressive-because-we-ve-failed-at-semantic-web-and-personal-computing), large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT shine precisely because we've abandoned the hard work of structuring information. Instead, we've defaulted to 'search' as a crutch—whether it's dumping files into Google Drive or relying on chatbots to parse poorly documented support pages.

The Seductive Shortcut of Search

The Dominica flag example underscores a pervasive pattern: we've traded meticulous organization for the illusion of convenience. In the early 2000s, visionaries dreamed of a Semantic Web—a machine-readable internet rich with metadata and logical links. That vision collapsed under the weight of implementation complexity and the rise of JavaScript-heavy, dynamically rendered websites that buried structure under layers of `
` tags. Today, e-commerce sites saturate product pages with keywords instead of intuitive categorization, and cloud storage platforms like Google Drive offer chaotic interfaces that make file management a chore.

'Why create a well-organized e-commerce site, just add a search bar,' Rakhim notes, highlighting how this approach has become the de facto standard. But search is computationally costly. LLMs compensate by building ephemeral 'semantic maps' from unstructured data—a brute-force process that demands massive resources, unlike the efficient querying a truly structured web would enable.


Personal Computing's Unfulfilled Promise

Compounding this is the stagnation of personal computing. Machines could have evolved into personalized knowledge bases, akin to Apple's pioneering HyperCard, with semantic links that empower users to navigate and build upon information intuitively. Instead, our devices are cluttered with fragmented data, forcing AI to act as an intermediary. This inefficiency isn't just technical—it's existential. Knowledge embedded in LLMs is opaque and transient, locked inside 'impenetrable models' rather than being openly accessible and human-readable.

AI as Ephemeral Scaffolding

LLMs are impressive, but they're a symptom of regression, not progress. They infer structure from chaos at great computational expense, answering questions like the Dominica flag riddle by scanning vast swaths of the web. Yet, as Rakhim observes, 'if all knowledge were stored in a structured way with rich semantic linking, primitive natural language processing could parse such queries with orders of magnitude fewer resources.' The rise of AI doesn't herald a new era of intelligence; it underscores decades of neglected infrastructure. For developers and tech leaders, the lesson is clear: investing in semantic standards and user-centric data design isn't nostalgic—it's essential to building sustainable, transparent systems where AI augments rather than replaces foundational organization.

As we marvel at ChatGPT's capabilities, let's remember: true innovation lies not in masking our failures with computational muscle, but in reviving the disciplined pursuit of a web that thinks with us, not for us.

#SemanticWeb #PersonalComputing #LLMs