Despite impressive stock market debuts, newly listed Chinese AI chipmakers Moore Threads, Biren, and MetaX collectively generate less than 10% of rival Cambricon's sales revenue.
The recent stock market launches of Chinese AI chip designers Moore Threads, Biren, and MetaX drew significant investor enthusiasm, with each company enjoying what financial analysts termed 'stellar' trading debuts. This market reception highlights investor appetite for alternatives to Western AI accelerator chips amid ongoing U.S. export restrictions. Yet beneath the initial trading surge lies a stark commercial reality: Financial Times analysis reveals none of these newcomers generates sales exceeding even 10% of domestic market leader Cambricon Technologies' revenue figures.
These three companies represent China's concerted push to build independent AI infrastructure. Moore Threads develops GPUs for data center and edge computing applications, positioning itself as a domestic alternative to Nvidia's data center products. Biren Technology focuses on general-purpose GPU architectures optimized for AI workloads across cloud and enterprise environments. MetaX (also known as Metax) specializes in high-performance computing chips for scientific simulation and machine learning tasks. All three target the critical gap created by U.S. sanctions limiting Chinese access to advanced semiconductors.
Their stock market success contrasts sharply with commercial traction. While specific sales figures remain undisclosed, industry analysts confirm Cambricon—China's established leader in AI-specific processors—generates approximately $300 million annually from its cloud and edge AI chips. Moore Threads, Biren, and MetaX collectively sit below the $30 million revenue threshold, placing them in early commercial phases despite their technical ambitions. This revenue gap persists despite substantial state-backed investment in domestic semiconductor capabilities through initiatives like China's Big Fund.
The disparity underscores several market challenges. Cambricon benefits from first-mover advantage, having supplied chips to Alibaba, Baidu, and other tech giants since 2016. New entrants face longer qualification cycles with hyperscalers and must prove reliability at scale while navigating complex U.S. equipment restrictions. Their current losses reflect heavy R&D investment against these barriers rather than pure market rejection.
Market positioning reveals divergent strategies. Cambricon dominates cloud AI inference workloads, while Biren targets training acceleration—a segment requiring bleeding-edge process nodes currently restricted by U.S. sanctions. Moore Threads pursues the automotive and industrial markets where performance thresholds are slightly lower. MetaX's scientific computing focus offers niche opportunities but limits volume potential.
Why this gap matters beyond financial metrics:
- Ecosystem dependence: Success requires software partnerships these startups are still building
- Manufacturing constraints: All rely on SMIC's 7nm and 14nm nodes, limiting performance parity with global peers
- Geopolitical vulnerability: Further U.S. restrictions could disrupt supply chains for design tools and fabrication
Despite trailing Cambricon, these IPOs provide crucial capital for scaling production and software development. Market optimism stems from China's estimated $7 billion domestic AI chip market—expected to grow at 28% CAGR through 2028. If these firms execute on fabrication partnerships and software optimization, they could capture segments where Cambricon's architecture isn't optimal. However, their path remains steep: matching Cambricon's scale would require tripling current revenues while maintaining R&D pace against better-funded international rivals.
The disconnect between market excitement and commercial reality highlights investor bets on China's semiconductor independence rather than near-term fundamentals. As these companies deploy IPO capital into production and customer acquisition throughout 2026, their ability to convert technical promise into sustainable revenue will determine whether they become viable challengers or case studies in the perils of geopolitically-driven valuations.
Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion