Heroku Is Not Dead — Things Have Changed

The narrative that "Heroku is dead" has been circulating for years, but recent developments suggest the platform is far from obsolete. While it's true that Heroku has undergone significant changes since Salesforce acquired it in 2010, these changes reflect broader shifts in cloud computing rather than the platform's demise.

The Evolution of Heroku

Heroku pioneered the Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) model when it launched in 2007, offering developers a simple way to deploy applications without managing infrastructure. The "git push heroku master" workflow became iconic in the developer community. However, as cloud computing matured, the landscape changed dramatically.

Several factors contributed to the perception that Heroku was declining:

• Pricing changes: Heroku's pricing structure has evolved, with some users experiencing significant cost increases
• Feature limitations: Compared to modern cloud providers, Heroku's feature set can seem limited
• Competition: Services like Vercel, Railway, and Render have emerged with similar developer experiences
• Enterprise focus: Salesforce has steered Heroku toward enterprise customers

What's Actually Happening

Despite these challenges, Heroku continues to release updates and improvements. Recent developments include:

• Enhanced dyno types: New performance tiers for different workload requirements
• Improved add-on ecosystem: Expanded integrations with third-party services
• Better monitoring tools: Enhanced observability features for production applications
• Container Registry support: Modern deployment options for containerized applications

The platform still serves thousands of active applications and maintains a loyal user base, particularly among startups and small teams who value its simplicity.

The Reality Check

[IMAGE:1]

Heroku's value proposition has shifted rather than disappeared. While it may not be the cutting-edge choice for every project, it remains an excellent option for:

• Rapid prototyping: Quick deployment without infrastructure concerns
• Small to medium applications: Cost-effective hosting for apps with predictable traffic
• Teams without DevOps expertise: Managed platform eliminates operational overhead
• Educational purposes: Great learning environment for understanding deployment concepts

Alternatives and Considerations

The rise of alternatives doesn't necessarily mean Heroku is dead—it means the market has matured. Services like Railway and Render offer similar developer experiences with different pricing models, while traditional cloud providers like AWS and Google Cloud provide more granular control at potentially lower costs.

When evaluating Heroku today, consider:

• Your team's expertise: Do you have DevOps resources?
• Application requirements: What are your performance and scaling needs?
• Budget constraints: How does Heroku's pricing compare to alternatives?
• Long-term strategy: Does Heroku align with your growth plans?

Looking Forward

Heroku's future likely involves continued evolution rather than dramatic reinvention. The platform may never regain its early dominance, but it can remain relevant by focusing on its core strengths: simplicity, reliability, and developer experience.

For many developers and teams, Heroku remains a viable option—just not the only option. The key is understanding how it fits into today's diverse cloud ecosystem rather than comparing it to its past self.

The death of Heroku has been greatly exaggerated. Like many technologies that mature, it has found its niche rather than disappearing entirely.