Horizon redress still a mess, MPs say • The Register

More than a year after MPs warned that victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal were still waiting for compensation, Parliament says the system meant to pay them remains slow, bureaucratic, and flawed – meaning thousands of sub-postmasters are still fighting for payouts while taxpayers pick up the bill.

A new report from the UK Parliament Business and Trade Committee concludes serious problems persist in the schemes set up to compensate people wrongly accused of theft and fraud because of faults in the Horizon accounting system. Even though more than £1.4 billion has already been paid out, MPs say many victims are still stuck navigating slow claims processes, legal wrangling, and long waits for decisions after years of battling to clear their names.

"For hundreds of subpostmasters, justice has come far too slowly," committee chair Liam Byrne said in a statement. "Many have waited years for the truth to be recognized and for the compensation they are owed. Yet today we find serious structural failings still blocking the road to justice."

The scandal traces back to the Horizon accounting system built by Fujitsu and rolled out across the Post Office. When the software started showing mysterious shortfalls in branch accounts, the losses were pinned on local operators, leading to hundreds of prosecutions, bankrupt businesses, and lives turned upside down, only for courts to eventually throw out the convictions years later.

The government has since created several compensation schemes, collectively expected to cost close to £2 billion. MPs say, however, the machinery meant to deliver that redress remains clunky and stressful for claimants.

"Thousands of victims are still waiting for fair redress, while the processes designed to help them are too often slow, bureaucratic and re-traumatizing," Byrne said. "That is simply unacceptable after one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British history."

Among the committee's strongest criticisms is the continuing role of the Post Office in administering compensation. The report argues the organization should not be responsible for running schemes to repair damage caused by its own past actions and recommends the work be transferred to the Department for Business and Trade or an independent body.

MPs also highlighted persistent delays in processing claims and difficulties victims face in obtaining records needed to prove their losses. In some cases, the disclosure of Post Office documents can take months, slowing claims that already stretch back years.

Another sticking point is the absence of any financial contribution from Fujitsu, which built and maintained the Horizon system. The company previously acknowledged a "moral obligation" to help pay compensation, but so far the government – and by extension taxpayers – have carried the cost.

"Worse, Fujitsu has yet to contribute a penny to the nearly £2 billion redress bill, even as it continues to benefit from public contracts," Byrne said. "It is simply wrong that taxpayers are covering the costs for Fujitsu's sins while Fujitsu is still profiting from taxpayers [sic] funded contracts."

The committee warned that Horizon may not be the only flawed system to have triggered wrongful prosecutions. Evidence presented to MPs suggests cases linked to an earlier accounting platform known as Capture could represent "only the tip of another iceberg."

"We were also concerned to hear new evidence that suggests unsafe convictions linked to earlier systems such as Capture may be only the tip of another iceberg," Byrne said, urging Parliament to act quickly if those convictions prove unsafe.

"The victims of this scandal have shown extraordinary courage," he added. "The country owes them more than apologies — it owes them justice, accountability, and full and fair redress without further delay."

®

Background on the Horizon scandal

The Post Office Horizon scandal represents one of the largest miscarriages of justice in UK history. Between 1999 and 2015, hundreds of sub-postmasters were prosecuted for theft, fraud, and false accounting based on discrepancies in their branch accounts that were actually caused by bugs in the Horizon accounting system.

The software, developed by Fujitsu, was rolled out across the UK's 11,000 post office branches. When accounting shortfalls appeared, sub-postmasters were required to cover the losses from their own funds, leading to bankruptcy, criminal convictions, and in some cases, prison sentences.

It wasn't until 2015 that the first successful legal challenge exposed the software's flaws. Subsequent investigations revealed that the Post Office had known about system errors for years but continued to pursue prosecutions. By 2020, hundreds of convictions had been overturned, and in 2024, the government passed legislation to quash all remaining convictions related to Horizon.

Compensation schemes and their shortcomings

The government has established multiple compensation schemes since the scandal came to light. The main scheme, administered by the Post Office, has paid out over £1.4 billion to date. However, the Business and Trade Committee's report highlights several ongoing issues:

• Processing delays that can stretch for months or years
• Complex documentation requirements that many victims struggle to meet
• The Post Office's continued role in administering compensation despite being the party responsible for the initial harm
• Lack of transparency in decision-making processes
• Insufficient support for victims navigating the claims process

Fujitsu's absence from redress payments

Despite acknowledging a "moral obligation" to contribute to compensation, Fujitsu has not paid anything toward the nearly £2 billion redress bill. The company continues to hold UK government contracts worth hundreds of millions of pounds, creating a situation where taxpayers are effectively funding both the compensation and Fujitsu's profits.

This arrangement has drawn criticism from multiple quarters, with calls for the government to either withhold future contracts until Fujitsu contributes or to pursue legal action to recover costs.

Broader implications

The committee's warning about potential issues with the Capture system suggests the Horizon scandal may be part of a larger pattern of technological failures leading to wrongful prosecutions. This raises questions about the reliability of digital evidence in criminal cases and the need for better oversight of government IT systems.

For the technology sector, the scandal highlights the potentially devastating consequences of software errors in critical systems. It also underscores the importance of robust testing, transparent error reporting, and accountability mechanisms when public institutions rely on private sector technology.

The ongoing delays in compensation delivery mean that many victims, some of whom have already waited over a decade for justice, continue to face financial hardship and emotional distress. The committee's report emphasizes that the current system's failures compound the original injustice, creating what many describe as a second trauma for those affected.

As the government considers the committee's recommendations, the focus remains on ensuring that the remaining victims receive timely, fair compensation while preventing similar technological failures from causing harm in the future.