Apple has filed a motion in Indian court seeking to prevent antitrust regulators from accessing its global financial documents ahead of a crucial hearing that could determine whether the company faces a potential $38 billion fine related to App Store practices.

Apple's ongoing legal battle with India's Competition Commission (CCI) escalated this week as the tech giant seeks judicial intervention to block regulators from accessing its global financial records. The dispute centers on an antitrust investigation into Apple's App Store practices in India, with a pivotal hearing scheduled for January 27 that could determine penalty calculation methodology.
The CCI initiated its investigation several years ago over allegations that Apple imposed unfair restrictions on app developers through its App Store policies. Under India's 2023 Competition (Amendment) Act, penalties can be calculated based on a company's global turnover – a provision that could expose Apple to fines up to $38 billion. Apple contends this approach is disproportionate since the investigation concerns only its Indian operations.
Earlier this month, the CCI issued a final warning to Apple, accusing the company of deliberately delaying the investigation through repeated requests for extensions. Apple denied these allegations in court filings while requesting a stay on the investigation until the penalty calculation issue is resolved.

In a January 15 motion filed with India's National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Apple requested an order preventing the CCI from demanding access to its worldwide financial documents. The company argued that complying with such demands before the court rules on the penalty calculation question would undermine its core legal challenge. Apple maintains that the CCI's authority to impose penalties based on global revenue violates principles of territorial jurisdiction.
The CCI has defended the penalty structure as necessary to deter violations by multinational corporations, asserting that Apple's delays have compromised procedural discipline. Legal experts note this case will test the boundaries of India's updated competition law framework and could set precedents for how global tech companies operate in one of the world's fastest-growing digital markets.
With the January 27 hearing imminent, Apple has requested expedited consideration of its motion. The court's decision will determine whether Indian regulators can compel disclosure of Apple's global financials while simultaneously weighing whether penalties should be based on worldwide revenue or restricted to Indian operations.
This case occurs against the backdrop of Apple's expanding investment in India, including manufacturing operations and retail expansion. The outcome could significantly impact how multinational tech companies approach compliance with India's evolving regulatory landscape, particularly concerning digital marketplaces and app ecosystems.
Legal analysts suggest the court faces a complex balancing act between enforcing domestic competition laws and respecting the jurisdictional limits of national regulators. The decision could influence similar antitrust investigations globally as regulators increasingly scrutinize app store practices and digital market dominance.

Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion