Modern C

The flat AST approach represents a fascinating evolution in compiler design, where performance considerations drive architectural decisions that challenge traditional programming paradigms. By encoding entire syntax trees into single integer slices, we achieve remarkable cache efficiency at the cost of developer ergonomics. This tension between machine optimization and human readability has long been a central theme in systems programming.

The Flat AST Revolution

The core insight behind flat ASTs is deceptively simple: modern CPUs are bottlenecked by memory access patterns far more than by raw computation. Traditional pointer-based trees scatter nodes across memory, causing cache misses that dwarf the cost of pointer dereferencing. By contrast, a contiguous slice of integers ensures that traversing a syntax tree walks through memory sequentially, maximizing cache line utilization.

This approach isn't merely theoretical. The egg parser generator demonstrates that a well-designed flat AST can parse complex grammars while maintaining zero garbage collection pressure. The entire parse tree exists as a single []int32 slice, with each node encoded as a sequence of integers representing either non-terminals (with symbol IDs and child counts) or terminals (with token indices).

Ergonomics Through Abstraction

The initial reaction to flat ASTs is often visceral discomfort. As one community member noted, the raw traversal code involving manual index arithmetic can be deeply off-putting. This reaction is entirely justified—when we're forced to think in terms of byte offsets and slice manipulations, we lose the mental model that makes tree algorithms intuitive.

However, the solution isn't to abandon flat ASTs but to build better abstractions. The "view" struct pattern elegantly solves this problem by creating lightweight windows into the integer slice without triggering allocations. By defining a node struct that contains only a slice reference and metadata, we preserve the zero-allocation property while restoring the concept of a "node" that developers can reason about.

The iterator pattern takes this abstraction further by hiding the pointer arithmetic entirely. Using Go 1.23's standard iterator interface, we can traverse the flat AST with familiar for range loops, switching on node types and recursing as if we were working with traditional pointer-based trees. The performance cost is negligible—the iterator function is inlined, and the view structs are passed by value on the stack.

Lookahead and LL(1) Parsing

One of the most elegant aspects of this approach is how naturally it handles LL(1) parsing requirements. The need to peek at upcoming tokens without consuming them is a fundamental challenge in top-down parsing, and traditional solutions often involve complex state machines or backtracking.

By combining the iterator pattern with iter.Pull, we gain precise control over traversal while maintaining clean abstractions. The ability to "pause" iteration and manually step through nodes enables sophisticated parsing strategies without sacrificing readability. This is particularly valuable for handling constructs like character ranges or optional elements where the parser must make decisions based on upcoming tokens.

Performance Implications

The zero-allocation property of flat ASTs has profound implications for real-world performance. Garbage collection pauses, even when brief, can be catastrophic in latency-sensitive applications. By eliminating heap allocations for the parse tree itself, we remove a major source of GC pressure.

This approach also enables new optimization opportunities. Since the entire AST exists in a single contiguous block, we can apply whole-program optimizations that would be impossible with scattered pointer-based structures. Memory-mapped files, for instance, could potentially be parsed directly into the AST representation without any copying.

The Future of Systems Programming

Flat ASTs represent a broader trend in systems programming where we're learning to embrace constraints that seem hostile to developer experience but enable remarkable performance characteristics. The key insight is that these constraints don't have to be exposed to application code—we can build ergonomic abstractions that hide the complexity while preserving the benefits.

This pattern extends beyond parsing. Any data structure that benefits from cache locality could potentially be represented as a flat memory layout with appropriate view types and iterators. The combination of modern language features (like Go's iterators) and careful API design makes these approaches practical for everyday development.

Practical Considerations

Implementing a flat AST system requires careful attention to several details. The encoding format must balance compactness with ease of decoding. The view types must be designed to prevent accidental mutations that could corrupt the shared memory. The iterator must handle edge cases like empty nodes and malformed input gracefully.

Perhaps most importantly, the abstraction layer must be designed with the principle of least surprise. Developers should be able to work with the AST using familiar patterns without needing to understand the underlying memory layout. This requires extensive testing and iteration to ensure that the abstractions feel natural while maintaining their zero-allocation guarantees.

Conclusion

The evolution from raw integer slices to ergonomic tree traversal represents a maturation of the flat AST concept. What began as a performance optimization has become a demonstration of how thoughtful API design can bridge the gap between machine efficiency and human productivity.

The egg parser generator shows that we don't need to choose between performance and ergonomics—we can have both by building the right abstractions. As systems programming continues to evolve, this pattern of exposing constraints through clean interfaces will likely become increasingly important.

For developers considering flat ASTs or similar performance-oriented data structures, the lesson is clear: start with the performance requirements, but invest heavily in the abstraction layer. The result can be code that's both blazingly fast and a pleasure to work with.

{{IMAGE:1}}

Featured image: The evolution of AST representation from pointer-based trees to flat memory layouts