The Biden administration proceeds with Gaza reconstruction plans despite Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's public rejections, highlighting deepening policy divisions.

The United States is moving forward with its vision for Gaza's future despite explicit opposition from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to diplomatic sources familiar with the negotiations. This strategic divergence marks one of the most visible policy rifts between the allies since the Israel-Hamas conflict began.
The administration's multi-phase plan centers on establishing an interim governance structure in Gaza involving Palestinian Authority officials alongside international partners. Technical committees would oversee reconstruction efforts funded primarily by Gulf states, with security guarantees from regional actors including Egypt and Jordan. Infrastructure rehabilitation priorities include restoring power grids, water systems, and medical facilities destroyed during hostilities.
Netanyahu publicly rejected core components of the proposal during a cabinet meeting this week, insisting Israel must maintain indefinite security control over Gaza. His alternative plan advocates for localized civilian administration without Palestinian Authority involvement. The Prime Minister's office circulated a memorandum stating: 'Premature international arrangements would compromise our security achievements.'
Behind closed doors, US diplomats continue technical coordination with Arab partners on reconstruction logistics. Satellite imagery analysis obtained by conflict monitoring groups indicates over 60% of Gaza's housing stock requires repair or replacement. Humanitarian organizations estimate reconstruction costs could exceed $15 billion based on structural damage assessments.
State Department officials acknowledge the impasse but emphasize ongoing coordination on tactical matters like aid distribution and temporary housing. 'Operational cooperation continues daily,' noted a US official speaking anonymously, 'while strategic differences require further diplomatic engagement.'
The disagreement extends to post-conflict security arrangements. Washington proposes a joint task force including Egyptian and Jordanian personnel to patrol Gaza's borders, while Israel insists on unilateral surveillance rights and rapid-response capabilities within the territory. Military analysts note these conflicting positions complicate negotiations over Gaza's crucial Rafah crossing.
As bulldozers clear rubble in less contested areas, the political stalemate delays comprehensive reconstruction. International donors have pledged approximately $3.4 billion for urgent humanitarian needs, though disbursement remains contingent on agreed governance mechanisms. With Netanyahu reiterating his objections during yesterday's security cabinet meeting, the diplomatic deadlock shows no immediate signs of resolution.

Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion