Webinar Tomorrow: Closing the Gaps from Alert to Resolution in Network Incident Response

Network incidents can spiral from a single alert to a full‑blown outage in minutes. Most organizations blame the technology stack, but the real bottleneck often appears after the alert fires—when responders scramble to gather context, decide who owns the case, and coordinate actions across dozens of tools.

Why it matters now

• Modern environments are a patchwork of monitoring platforms, identity providers, and cloud services. Each adds visibility, but also adds a manual step for analysts.
• According to the 2025 SANS Incident Response Survey, the average time spent on manual enrichment and ticket routing is 38 minutes per incident, a figure that directly correlates with longer service disruptions.
• Delays in triage increase the window for attackers to move laterally, especially when alerts lack enriched threat context.

Expert perspective

“Automation isn’t about replacing analysts; it’s about giving them the time to think instead of click,” says Evan D. Kline, senior product manager at Tines. “When you can automatically pull NetFlow data, enrich it with identity logs, and surface a risk score, the analyst can focus on containment and remediation.”

Kline will co‑host the webinar with Megan Liu, incident response lead at BleepingComputer, who has overseen more than 200 network breach investigations in the past two years.

What you’ll walk away with

The 60‑minute session, “From Alert to Resolution: Fixing the Gaps in Network Incident Response,” will walk through a real‑world workflow, from the moment a SIEM alert lights up to the final remediation ticket closure. Attendees will see concrete examples of:

1. Automatic enrichment – Pulling VLAN, device inventory, and user‑session data into the alert without any manual API calls.
2. AI‑driven prioritization – Using a lightweight model to assign a risk score based on threat intel, asset criticality, and recent activity.
3. Dynamic routing – Sending high‑risk alerts straight to the on‑call network engineer while lower‑risk cases are batched for the SOC tier‑2 team.
4. Coordinated resolution – Triggering configuration changes in firewalls, updating DNS records, and closing tickets in ServiceNow—all from a single Tines workflow.

Practical takeaways you can implement today

• Standardize enrichment sources – Identify the three data sets that give you the most context (e.g., NetFlow, Azure AD sign‑ins, threat intel feeds) and build a simple script to attach them to every alert.
• Adopt a risk‑scoring rubric – Start with a spreadsheet that weights asset value, exploitability, and recent alerts. Even a manual score can highlight the incidents that need immediate attention.
• Create a “handoff” playbook – Define who owns each stage (triage, investigation, remediation) and automate the handoff via a ticketing API. The playbook should include clear SLAs for each transition.
• Pilot a single workflow – Choose a high‑volume alert type (e.g., port‑scan detection) and build a Tines flow that enriches, scores, and routes it. Measure the reduction in mean time to acknowledge (MTTA) and iterate.

How to join

The webinar is free and open to anyone interested in tightening their network response process. Register now to reserve your spot and receive a pre‑webinar checklist that will help you prepare your own automation pilot.

Date: June 2, 2026 Time: 10:00 AM PT / 1:00 PM ET

➡ Register now

---

BleepingComputer and Tines will also make the slide deck available after the event, so you can reference the workflow diagrams and code snippets at your own pace.