Ofqual’s chief regulator says emerging wearable tech – from discreet smart glasses to hidden earpieces – creates a new, hard‑to‑detect cheating risk for GCSEs. The watchdog is drafting tighter exam‑room rules and considering stronger safeguards for coursework as AI‑generated work becomes indistinguishable from student output.
Regulatory action
Ofqual, the UK’s exams regulator, has issued an urgent advisory to schools, exam centres and local authorities. In a podcast released on 7 June 2026, chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham highlighted that consumer‑grade wearable devices – smart glasses, bone‑conduction earpieces and AI‑enabled headsets – are now capable of delivering real‑time answers, effectively turning a GCSE paper into a live Google search.

What it requires
- Immediate risk assessment – All schools must complete a written assessment of the likelihood that students could bring or conceal wearable tech into any high‑stakes exam. The assessment should be submitted to Ofqual by 31 July 2026.
- Updated invigilation protocols – From the start of the 2026/27 exam cycle, exam venues must:
- Conduct a visual sweep for glasses and headsets before entry.
- Require students to store any personal eyewear in a sealed locker; approved prescription glasses may be used only if a secondary, non‑electronic pair is provided by the school.
- Deploy metal‑detector style scanners capable of flagging embedded Bluetooth or Wi‑Fi modules.
- Technology‑use policy – Schools must publish a clear policy prohibiting any device that can:
- Display visual information to the wearer without external visibility.
- Transmit audio or data wirelessly.
- Run AI assistants (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini) offline or online. The policy must be communicated to pupils and parents by 1 September 2026 and reinforced during pre‑exam briefings.
- Coursework integrity measures – Ofqual is piloting a set of safeguards for coursework that will become mandatory if pilot data shows a >20 % risk of AI‑generated submissions:
- Mandatory submission of raw drafts and revision histories through a secure platform such as Turnitin Draft Coach.
- Randomised oral defence of the work for 10 % of candidates.
- A requirement that any AI‑assisted tool be disclosed in a bibliography, with the tool’s output clearly marked.
- Reporting and sanctions – Any breach involving wearable tech must be logged in the national malpractice register within 48 hours of detection. Repeat offences will trigger a minimum 6‑month exclusion from all regulated qualifications.
Compliance timeline
| Deadline | Action | Responsible party |
|---|---|---|
| 31 July 2026 | Submit risk‑assessment report | School senior leadership team |
| 1 September 2026 | Publish and disseminate device‑prohibition policy | Exams officer / Head of teaching |
| Start of 2026/27 exams | Implement visual sweep and scanner checks | Invigilators and venue managers |
| Ongoing | Record and report wearable‑device incidents | Exam centre staff |
| Mid‑2027 (subject to pilot outcomes) | Apply coursework AI‑integrity safeguards | Subject leads and assessment coordinators |
Why this matters
The data cited by Ofqual shows 2,225 device‑related malpractice cases in 2025, representing 44.3 % of all incidents. While smartphones have been the traditional focus, the shift to near‑invisible wearables removes the visual cue that invigilators rely on. Because these devices can pull information from the internet or a pre‑loaded AI model, they bypass the typical “no‑phone” rule entirely.
By establishing concrete inspection procedures and a transparent policy framework, Ofqual aims to restore confidence that GCSE results reflect genuine student ability rather than the capabilities of a hidden gadget.
Next steps for schools
- Review existing inventories of scanning equipment and budget for upgrades where necessary.
- Train invigilators on the visual characteristics of common smart‑glass models (e.g., transparent displays, slight tint, micro‑camera lenses).
- Conduct mock‑exam drills that include simulated attempts to use wearables, allowing staff to refine detection techniques.
- Engage with parents to explain why certain personal items (e.g., prescription glasses) may need to be replaced with school‑issued alternatives during exams.
Wider implications
If the wearable‑tech threat proves difficult to mitigate, Ofqual has signalled that it may re‑evaluate the role of coursework in qualifications where authenticity cannot be assured. This could lead to a shift back toward fully controlled, timed assessments for subjects that currently rely heavily on project‑based evaluation.
Schools that act promptly and document their compliance will be better positioned to avoid sanctions and to demonstrate to Ofqual that they are safeguarding the integrity of the UK’s qualification framework.

Comments
Please log in or register to join the discussion